Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolfowitz: We ‘won’ the Iraq War
The Hill ^ | 08/06/14 08:17 AM EDT | Kristina Wong

Posted on 08/07/2014 11:06:26 AM PDT by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Leaning Right

What makes any of them think this war will be won? They’ve not identified the enemy.


21 posted on 08/07/2014 11:25:36 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
The last war we won was WWII.

And even then, half of Europe merely exchanged one set of chains for another.

22 posted on 08/07/2014 11:26:14 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Nope. He was just as anti-Israel as any of the other tyrants, and a big aid to Hamas to boot.

What was said in this thread multiple times, i.e. winning the peace, is the only viable solution. Saddam, a Ba’athist (national-socialist) mass murderer, would have been overjoyed to have joined in the “Arab Spring” (one does not need to presume an Obama presidency to predict such an event).


23 posted on 08/07/2014 11:26:56 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
When asked his thoughts about the current situation in Iraq and whether the war was a mistake, Wolfowitz replied, “We have won it—in 2009.” […]

This is a lot of crap, Mr. Wolfowitz. That war officially became a disaster and a farce the moment the U.S. government (the "winners," according to you) allowed the new Iraqi government to adopt a constitution in which Islam is enshrined as the official state religion.

Why don't you just go away already?

24 posted on 08/07/2014 11:27:15 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Half?

The social market economy (imposed via the European Union “predecessors”) was its own set of chains, albeit lighter at first.


25 posted on 08/07/2014 11:27:56 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
While Obama and his minions, trash Bush at every opportunity.

A winning strategy since 2008.

26 posted on 08/07/2014 11:28:22 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There is winning, and there is winning. We won the moment by brute force, but we’ve lost the long haul by sheer stupidity. It was inevitable from the beginning, and Bush’s people should have known it. Obama’s people are too incompetent to know or do anything.


27 posted on 08/07/2014 11:28:45 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Iraqi Christians sure would have been better off.

Saddam became more radicalized because we fought him in the first Gulf War. Who cares about Kuwait anyway? Why do we get involved in intra-Arab/Muslim squabbles in the first place? To protect our Saudi masters, that’s why.


28 posted on 08/07/2014 11:28:52 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

No.. Iraq was this generation’s Viet-Nam.

I wasn’t alive during Viet-Nam. My father was over there during 66-68, so I’m familiar with it.

For both “wars”, our guys went over there and kicked ass, but we lacked the political will to win AT HOME. Wars should be declared/funded by politicians, and they need to get the hell out of the way. Let the military and fighting people do their jobs. Instead, you have politicians selecting targets from the White House, creating impossible rules of engagement, and basically refusing to win.

It was just a shame. Wolfo(whatever the hell is name is) should be strung up, and be a tree ornament at Arlington Cemetery(among many other so-called “leaders”).

/rant_Off


29 posted on 08/07/2014 11:29:11 AM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Never mind letting an Iran-linked Twelver entity such as the Islamic Dawa Party to even participate.
30 posted on 08/07/2014 11:29:15 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Surely you aren’t going to equate that with life behind the Iron Curtain?


31 posted on 08/07/2014 11:29:54 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Let’s be brutally honest here. The sad truth is that Iraq is a complete disaster today because Saddam Haddam was far more effective at dealing with radical Islamic extremists than George W. Bush ever was.


32 posted on 08/07/2014 11:30:46 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I backed Bush in the iraq war. But not happily.

We should have attacked those training Al Qaida centers in Egypt and Saudi Arabia along with Afghanistan and yes our ‘allies’ in Pakistan. but Egypt and Saudi Arabia were run by the Bush family personal ‘friends’, we weren’t going to hit there.
As horrible as Iraq’s Hussein was, He was a stabilizing influence against Muslim extremists in the region.

Now we’re in a world of hurt at home and in the second term of a Marxist regime brought on in part by a recession and a war (Iraq) not connected with 9/11.


33 posted on 08/07/2014 11:30:54 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yup. He, Saddam, knew how to deal with his enemies and strike fear — gas them.


34 posted on 08/07/2014 11:31:35 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Saddam was merely par for the course in the Arab/Muslim world.


35 posted on 08/07/2014 11:31:45 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: caww
What makes any of them think this war will be won? They’ve not identified the enemy.

That's a really good point.

Can you imagine right after Pearl Harbor FDR saying something like this: We have been attacked by some Japanese imperialists. However, most Japanese imperialists are good people. Japanese imperialism is, in fact, a philosophy of peace.

36 posted on 08/07/2014 11:31:54 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

By “win” did you mean no?


37 posted on 08/07/2014 11:32:01 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Unlikely that Iraqi Christians would have been better off. That’s like saying that the extant Jews in Iran are “better off”.

It was not the Gulf War that “radicalized” Saddam. He was like that from the beginning. Ba’athism is just another form of Nazism.


38 posted on 08/07/2014 11:32:03 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

A “stabilizing influence” that openly aided Hamas?


39 posted on 08/07/2014 11:33:13 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So, guys like Saddam were all over the Arab world.


40 posted on 08/07/2014 11:33:16 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson