[ForYourChildren]

This is very good.

The premise is that the government believes all things and everyone belongs to it. And it is up to us for the burden of proof for anything that we believe does not belong to the government. And yet, given the governments presupposition, we will always lose.

What belongs to the government (or so they think):
- our income
- our homes
- our children
- etc.

The government has successfully taken dominance in many areas, and we see it is trying to take dominance in areas that the government knows it is weak. It wants full ownership of all that we have. So after successfully taken full ownership over many things, the government then identifies where it has weak dominance and goes after those.

Weak government dominance:
- gun
- churches

So we see very clearly the attack on guns and now on churches.

Is there anything else we have that the government does not own?

[MosesKnows]

The government has successfully taken dominance in many areas

There is a position that voters gave government dominance in areas they are not constitutionally empowered to legislate. Voters can elect someone to legislate constitutionally or unconstitutionally.

Corruption exist within both major parties and there is considerable evidence that people vote for the corruption that favors their interest.