1 posted on
08/01/2014 4:30:26 PM PDT by
bkopto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: bkopto
Insanity personified. That is why zero vacations here.
2 posted on
08/01/2014 4:34:01 PM PDT by
acapesket
To: bkopto
And this is the state that, back in 1775, had patriots at Lexington and Concord. Massachusetts committed suicide when it became a firmly-entrenched Democrat state.
3 posted on
08/01/2014 4:34:16 PM PDT by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: bkopto
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. And yet, here we are. :-(
4 posted on
08/01/2014 4:35:03 PM PDT by
doc1019
To: bkopto
This is a flagrant violation of the Second Amendment. Every one of these bastards need to be arrested and their asses thrown in prison where they belong.
5 posted on
08/01/2014 4:35:48 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(America is not a refugee camp! It is my home!!!)
To: Admin Moderator
Please change “Chief” in title to “Chiefs”. Thx
6 posted on
08/01/2014 4:36:04 PM PDT by
bkopto
(Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
To: bkopto
Anyone who remains in MA deserves what happens when they cannot defend themselves.
7 posted on
08/01/2014 4:37:35 PM PDT by
B4Ranch
(Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
To: bkopto
"At that time Evans also said, "For the most part, nobody in [Boston] needs a shotgun. Nobody needs a rifle."What? I think that each individual should make that decision. Wow what a arrogant SOB
9 posted on
08/01/2014 4:40:08 PM PDT by
WHBates
To: bkopto
The strongest guarantee in the Bill of Rights covers the Second Amendment: “shall not be infringed”. That isn’t just a restriction at the federal level, “Congress shall make no law”, it’s an absolute. This new rule has no legitimacy.
I miss the rule of law.
10 posted on
08/01/2014 4:40:20 PM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: bkopto
For
"The sole purpose of hunting down and killing people" Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts , Romney said. These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people.
12 posted on
08/01/2014 4:44:46 PM PDT by
ansel12
(LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
To: bkopto
Massacussetts deserves the dictators they elect.
13 posted on
08/01/2014 4:46:13 PM PDT by
MeganC
(It took Democrats four hours to deport Elian Gonzalez)
To: bkopto
Bring out the tar and feathers for these so called lawmakers or a rope.
14 posted on
08/01/2014 4:49:15 PM PDT by
bikerman
(any day above ground is a good day)
To: bkopto
So 200+ years hence and the king finally gets control over guns?
The police chief says essentially no one needs a shotgun or long gun.
Really mthrfkr?
You gonna decide what cars I dont need?
What size my home ought to be or how many I should be able to lawfully own?
I will never live in your POS state.
California pulls this, I can guarantee you I’ll leave.
Now the citizen has no means of self defense nor the ability to threaten, by force, the bumbling bureaucrats, who seek to undermine the constitution and make fellow citizens bow and pay fealty to tyrants.
FOAD....
15 posted on
08/01/2014 4:50:15 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: bkopto
Patently Unconstitutional and will be overturned.
16 posted on
08/01/2014 4:51:21 PM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: bkopto
We call this an ‘SS Officer’.
17 posted on
08/01/2014 4:52:21 PM PDT by
Viennacon
(Rebuke the Repuke!)
To: bkopto
To: bkopto
I'm a bit confused. The Gun Owners Action League says the bill Breitbart described on July 25 was altered quite a bit in the past week. It says that chiefs have to go to court to deny a permit (not that courts are any great defense any more).
Gun Owners Action League
28 posted on
08/01/2014 5:22:38 PM PDT by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: bkopto
I've just decided that I'm gonna challenge this.Although I've had a *completely* clean record for my *entire* life I live in a truly Maoist town whose police chief has a reputation for holding the 2nd Amendment in contempt.As a result my application will surely be denied.Then it's off to the races if I can find a way to fund this (I'm far from rich).
32 posted on
08/01/2014 5:36:23 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(We're The First Generation Not Forced To Fight To Defend Our Freedom.And It Shows!)
To: bkopto
36 posted on
08/01/2014 5:57:23 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: bkopto
Question: When the police chief "allows" someone to have a gun, and that person commits a murder with the gun, will the police chief now be an accessory to murder?
After all, he has the authority to grant & deny.
41 posted on
08/01/2014 6:38:25 PM PDT by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: bkopto
House Speaker Robert DeLeo (D) commented on the law: "We seek not to be the safest state in the nation but strive to make our communities the safest in the world." Apparently, the chief danger is that of tyranny. Someone needs to do something about that.
42 posted on
08/01/2014 9:09:37 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson