Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury awards parents $27 million in McDonald's negligence lawsuit
Bryan Eagle ^ | 7/30/2014 | Maggie Kiely

Posted on 07/31/2014 4:24:40 AM PDT by markomalley

A Brazos County jury on Wednesday awarded a $27 million in a lawsuit against McDonald’s relating to the 2012 deaths of two Blinn College students.

Jurors found McDonald’s negligence to be 97 percent responsible for the deaths of Denton Ward, 18, of Flower Mound, and Lauren Bailey Crisp, 19, of Flower Mound, both of whom died in the early morning hours of Feb. 18, 2012.

The remaining 3 percent of liability was laid on the men who violently attacked Ward and his friend, Tanner Giesen, 21, in the parking lot of the McDonald’s at 801 University Drive.

The jury’s verdict reflects the argument plaintiffs’ attorneys made from the start of the seven-day trial: Had Ward and Giesen not been assaulted at the McDonald’s, the car accident that occurred 11 minutes later while Samantha Bean, another friend, was attempting to get the men to the hospital would not have happened.

And because of a well-documented police record of fights and assaults at the University Drive McDonald’s in the months leading up to the incident, store managers and corporate employees had a duty to hire security to protect patrons.

It was never disputed during the trial that Crisp died in the car accident, but jurors did hear conflicting conclusions from expert witnesses as to Ward’s cause of death.

Two experts who testified for the plaintiffs asserted Ward was killed from injuries suffered while being punched, kicked and stomped on at the McDonald’s, while an expert for the defense — who was the only witness called on by McDonald’s — insisted Ward was fatally injured in the car wreck.  

“The thing that sets all of this in motion, and that’s the cause test, is McDonald’s,” said Chris Hamilton, lead plaintiff attorney, in closing arguments.

Hamilton and his co-counsels, Robert Langdon and Jon Miller, spent four days putting on evidence, with much of it focused on establishing a pattern of violence at the McDonald’s and showing the subsequent lack of action taken by company employees.

Carlos Butler, a former McDonald’s general manager and local hip-hop artist, said in a video deposition played for the jury that he was unaware of any of the 20-plus incidents police responded to from 2 a.m. to 4 a.m. on the weekends in the 11 months leading up to Ward and Giesen being attacked even though he had been the one to call 911 in at least one instance.

Jurors also saw video testimony from several McDonald’s corporate employees who denied having any knowledge of security issues at the location across from Texas A&M.

“It’s not about what [McDonald’s] knew, it’s about what they didn’t want to know,” Hamilton told jurors. “Their defense is, ‘I didn’t know anything about it.’”

McDonald’s attorneys Marshall Rosenberg and Paul Murphy argued the decisions made by the dead teens and their friends were what led to Crisp and Ward dying.

“Alcohol and consumption of alcohol by teenagers was the root cause,” Murphy said. “I’m not going to do a disservice to anyone and agree to some alternate reality.”

Prior to arriving at the McDonald’s, all four of the friends had been at Hurricane Harry’s drinking and left the bar in Ward’s 4Runner headed to McDonald’s.

Once they arrived, Ward and Giesen went in to use the restroom while Crisp and Bean went through the drive-thru to avoid the large crowd of people, according to testimony.

When the women rounded the corner of the drive-thru, they saw their friends getting beaten, which is when Crisp jumped out to grab Ward, her boyfriend, as Giesen was carried to the car by two unknown women and Bean hopped into the driver’s seat to try and get to the hospital.  

In the minutes leading up to the accident, Bean had plenty of opportunity to stop and call for help, Murphy argued.

“They want you to get good and angry at McDonald’s, that’s it,” he said.

The lawsuit was filed by Ward’s mother, Denise Whitaker, and Crisp’s parents, Paul and Nicole Crisp, all of whom testified Friday about how their lives have been affected by the loss of their first-born children.

The jury awarded

$11 million to Whitaker and $11 million to the Crisps for past and future loss of companionship and mental anguish, in addition to $5 million for the pain and mental anguish suffered by Ward, money legally bound for Whitaker.

“This won’t bring the kids back, but it does validate how their parents felt in terms of McDonald’s responsibility,” Hamilton said after the verdict. “I will tell my kids if they go to a McDonald’s at night and they don’t see an off-duty police officer, don’t get out of the car.”

It’s expected McDonald’s will appeal the verdict.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: business; deeppockets; idiocy; idiotjury; lawsuit; macdonalds; mcdonalds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Responsibility2nd

I’ll answer that. It makes some butt-ugly lawyer rich and important.


41 posted on 08/20/2014 8:29:31 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

I bet it also gives the suits in Corporate a message they better police up their ghetto-centric franchises like what they had in Bryan.


42 posted on 08/20/2014 8:32:59 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent

“McDonald’s had nothing at all to do with the kid’s deaths.”

The mgr was an aspiring hip hop dude that allowed his place to be a thug hang out. Just an hour before this incident, a ‘customer’ pulled a gun on another one. He was asked by mgt to take it outside.


43 posted on 08/20/2014 8:37:13 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Guess what—it’s still a mess at that place. Just some butt ugly lawyers all hot and jiggly after some money...


44 posted on 08/20/2014 10:49:02 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
As a parent of two graduates of A & M/College Station, and someone who loves the institution (well, most of it) this case excites my interest. And, normally, I am, as nearly all the commenters so far are (up to 43 of them), AGAINST ridiculous jury awards. However, the law as it is written is suppose to govern and minimally McDonald's was NEGLIGENT. The store in question had a history and they did nothing, the store in question had hundreds of black guys gathering there late at night and did nothing if not encouraged it, the store did nothing about security cameras resulting in no video evidence against the perp and a 90 day sentence. These are just a few of their negligence's. So, below, is the law in Texas on a store owners legal "duty" to provide a secure place for employees and patrons. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, having been involved in a similar case (dollars wise), the attorneys on both sides will settle as soon as McDonald's puts enough money on the table. My guess is about 2.7 million. I had one larger than this get stuck in the Supreme Court (of Texas) 4 years! So, there will be A LOT of pressure on the parents to settle and their attorneys will lead the charge when "their" money get's high enough. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3. So, as an land owner / occupier according to Texas Law, what duty is owed to my employees and business patrons? ∞ In Texas, the duty owed to an employee and business patron (invitee status) is the Highest. 1. Rule The land owner / occupier has a duty to INSPECT and MAKE SAFE any dangerous condition OR give adequate warning of that dangerous condition. Further, there is a duty to refrain from injuring a person willfully, wantonly or with gross negligence. McDonald's did not live up to this duty.
45 posted on 08/20/2014 10:49:54 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson