Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

Allowing the option of my plan is not at odds with anything you have said.

Some people will never pay of their loans in the way you describe. Their entire lives would be that of a debtor in financial prison. Allowing them another option hurts no one.

Why would you be against that?


37 posted on 07/25/2014 9:12:07 PM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles (Remember, you can't spell "progressive" without "SS".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


Oh hell, no!


38 posted on 07/25/2014 9:17:58 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles

Because it is a subsidy, it enlarges government, and it is not an appropriate role for government. As I described previously, government jobs provide counter productive/negative experience anyway.


39 posted on 07/25/2014 11:00:39 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson