Posted on 07/25/2014 5:19:24 AM PDT by cotton1706
Edited on 07/25/2014 5:21:43 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at emporiagazette.com ...
All the more reason to vote for Milton Wolf. I don’t even know a thing about Milton, but knowing this progressive RINO is endorsing his opponent, tells me all I need to know.
of course he did….the huckster rides on…..fooling the same little niche of numbskulls he always has.
Please note that AP material must be excerpted at all times, short articles to 50% of content.
LOL Who is more out of touch, 78 year old Sen. Pat Roberts or that doofus Mike Huckabee?
The weakness of conservative politics is that many good conservatives fall for fake conservative hucksters.
Sorry. I thought I did. I usually excerpt everything.
Oh, you mean not just the excerpt check-off? You mean, actually reduce what I post?
‘Course he did. Thick as thieves they are.
What Hucksters progressivism shows us is the fallacy of being a "social ONLY conservative." Many "social only cons love Huckabee, because on social issues he is conservative - so they blindly end up supporting a guy who is in many ways a progressive and a RINO as you state.
Some on FR get touchy and defensive when I talk about the dangers of social ONLY conservatism - and yet, Huckabee's existence as a player makes my case for me, in spades.
true, see post 10 for explanation of that point….
And I’m sure that throughout Kansas, millions of voters were unsure of who to vote for, waiting for Huckabee’s endorsement. </sarcasm>
I know there are some sites that must be exerpted, some sites we can’t post from at all but can only link, and so forth. Is that information listed anywhere?
Judging by the results, it's time to put a new pugilist into the ring.
Huckabee is a quasi Christian Socialist.
Huckabee is a tool (of the establishment RINOs). They trot him out whenever they need him to flip Christian focused voters away from conservative candidates.
Schmuckabee is a doofus. Endorsed race hustler Cochran too
Does the word "lower", that is tied to "taxes", also apply to "federal government spending"?
For a GOPe, I'd presume it does not, and thus the sentence touts bringing home the federal dollars.
Really? That's difficult to demonstrate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.