Posted on 07/24/2014 10:13:17 AM PDT by Kaslin
The corporate inversions just keep on coming, and the White House and its allies are calling them unpatriotic. But it's a funny sort of "patriotism" that insists American businesses put the Treasury's insatiable appetite for revenue ahead of the best interests of their customers, shareholders, and employees.
The latest inversion — the term for a corporate merger or acquisition that allows a US company to reincorporate overseas — is the largest to date: Chicago-based pharmaceutical company AbbVie is paying $55 billion to acquire Shire PLC, an Irish drug maker incorporated in the United Kingdom, but with a manufacturing and management base in Lexington. By moving its legal domicile to the UK, AbbVie expects to see a lower tax bill. The statutory corporate tax rate in Britain is just 21 percent. In the United States, it's a chart-topping 40 percent — the 35 percent federal rate plus an average of 5 percent imposed by the states. By 2016, the move should slice AbbVie's effective tax rate to 13 percent from the 22 percent it pays now, saving millions of dollars a year.
Nearly as big as the AbbVie-Shire deal was one announced last month. Medical-device giant Medtronic is acquiring Covidien, a health supplies business based in Mansfield but incorporated in Ireland, for $43 billion. The inversion will switch Medtronic's tax domicile to Ireland, which taxes corporate profits at just 12.5 percent — less than one-third the onerous US rate.
The number of inversions has been surging in recent years, putting Democrats' noses out of joint. Senator Carl Levin of Michigan is pushing legislation to impose a two-year moratorium on the transactions, which he denounces as "tax avoidance, plain and simple." Of course, tax avoidance is by definition lawful (as opposed to tax evasion, which is a crime). With America's corporate tax burden now the most punitive in the industrialized world, business executives would be derelict in their fiduciary duties if they didn't at least consider the competitive advantages of lawfully inverting.
Yet those who undertake such transactions are being blasted as un-American.
"Inverters are deserters," writes Fortune magazine's Alan Sloan in a Washington Post essay. Companies like AbbVie and Medtronic are abandoning America "to avoid paying taxes but expect to keep receiving the full benefits that being American confers, and for which everyone else is paying." Last week Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew urged Congress to "shut down this abuse of our tax system," and demanded "a new sense of economic patriotism" that won't tolerate such transactions.
This demagoguery is disgraceful. A company that structures a merger as an inversion is not deserting America, nor is it avoiding US taxes on revenue earned in the United States. Corporations that earn profits in America pay taxes in America, no matter where their legal domicile happens to be. AbbVie or Medtronic could reincorporate on one of the moons of Jupiter, and it would make no difference to IRS. As long as they keep doing business in the United States, their US income remains fully taxable.
It is only future foreign earnings — corporate profits earned abroad — that inversion protects from the IRS. Medtronic does business in scores of countries, paying taxes to those countries on income it earns within their borders. That won't change after the merger with Covidien. What will change is that Medtronic will no longer be taxed by the United States on income not earned in the United States. Unlike almost every other country, the US taxes American-domiciled businesses on their earnings anywhere on earth. As Abbott Laboratories CEO Miles White wrote recently, "It's a double whammy: the highest rate by far, and it's applied worldwide."
That's what's driving the wave of corporate inversions: Not a failure of "economic patriotism," but a predatory tax code that subjects American companies to economic pressures that foreign-based corporations are spared.
No taxpayer, individual or corporate, should be labeled unpatriotic for not paying more taxes than the law requires. "Anyone may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible," wrote Judge Learned Hand, one of the most renowned jurists in American history. "He is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the Treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes."
The way to keep US companies from re-domiciling overseas is not by cracking down, but by easing up. Lower the harsh rate, rein in the worldwide tax reach, and American businesses will have no reason to leave.
Heard something like this the other day — what is the supposed relationship between patriotism and paying taxes?
I would eliminate the corporate tax rate (at least for US companies) and all types of subsidies/loans from government. Sounds like a good compromise to me.
My head just exploded when I learned a corporation could pay less tax in incorporated in the socialist economy of the UK then in the "free market" of the USA
Delaware will not be happy.
The US has the highest corporate tax rates on Earth.
ON EARTH!
And the US taxes foreign profits that never come back to the US.... the only other country that does this is.... North Korea or something.
We've got "racists" and "sexists" although I have yet to see a clear definition of either.
What else? We've got a whole bunch of labels for things that are just the opposite, like, "liberals" (who are against liberty), "feminists" (who hate real femininity), "progressives" (who want to take us down into the pit), "gay" (sad, lonely, deviate, hurting people), "ACA" (which has nothing to do with "care" or affordability), $1 trillion HHS Dept (has nothing to do with health or servicing humans).
And on and on it goes. How could Orwell have been so spot on?
The costs of doing business can be so much cheaper overseas, in many ways. I would rather set up a business that uses foreign labor if it was cheaper than hiring Americans. Many relatively simple IT tasks especially will go the third world.
don’t forget the ‘haters’
The largest corporations support the high tax rate — for others. High corporate taxes are an impediment to small businesses who don’t have the resources or international revenue to practice tax avoidance.
It’s worse than that, the US has the highest corporate tax rates in the known universe!!!
lolz
even higher than the Klingons!
“It’s worse than that, the US has the highest corporate tax rates in the known universe!!!”
Further evidence of American exceptionalism.
It won't be so funny if the taxpayer funded American military no longer guarantees the safe transport of goods and enforcement of contracts.
It figures: Zer0 learns that money has legs...and his solution is to break its kneecaps.
It’s not only companies that are packing it in, citizens of this once great country are also renouncing their citizenship in numbers never seen in our history.
It should give pause to the democrats that maybe their ideas are to blame
Which is why American-domiciled businesses will continue to hold their foreign earnings overseas and will continue to do inversions. And if they pass legislation to prevent it, they'll be bought by foreign competitors and it will occur anyway.
Why, that's just a silly notion, you unpatriotic, denying hater.
Recent “news” includes:
Wealthy New Yorkers are NOT fleeing high taxes.
Kids have stopped throwing away federally mandated healthy school lunches and now enjoy fresh vegetables.
By next year, this won’t be happening either.
Although we have corporate person-hood, and corporations can do inversions, we as persons cannot perform inversions. US citizens, almost alone in the world, are subject to a unitary (or universal) taxation regime.
Anything a US citizen earns abroad must be reported to the IRS, and any extra taxes above those levied by the country in which the earnings occur, are due to the IRS. This control extends to assets as well as income—FATCA and similar rules make it very difficult for US citizens to have bank and brokerage accounts abroad. The rules are invasive and detailed; the penalties for error very high. Most foreign banks won’t even take accounts of US citizens.
This sort of asset trapping in the past occurred only in the most repressive of regimes, those who treated their citizens and citizens’ possessions as assets of the state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.