Because you are lying again.
I like her politics just fine and have posted so repeatedly, but that doesn’t change the facts of her lack of leadership.
She is not presidential material, her congress seat that she is leaving was her political peak.
Your desperation is to keep pretending she is a viable candidate for president, and you also pretend that I don’t agree because I oppose her politics, you are lying when you do that but it shows the cloudy thinking that keeps you playing the “Bachmann for 2016” game.
RE: Because you are lying again.
Where did I lie? I never accused you of anything. You’re the one getting personal.
RE: like her politics just fine and have posted so repeatedly, but that doesn’t change the facts of her lack of leadership.
I disagree about her lack of leadership. If the GOP refuses to take her seriously because she ( like Sarah Palin ) is PRINCIPLED a refuses to compromise on it, why should it be held against her?
RE: Your desperation is to keep pretending she is a viable candidate for president,
And your desperation is to ignore what I said IN COMPARISON to the list I gave. I also did mention my preference for Ted Cruz over her but you seem to ignore that too.
How did I lie again by the way?
RE: I don’t agree because I oppose her politics, you are lying when you do that
But I never said you opposed her politics, what I disagree with use is this :
A) You say she isn’t leadership material. I disagree. It is the GOP that refuses to take her seriously.
B) You say she isn’t viable. I ask COMPARED TO WHO?
Then I gave a few names being touted out there. When I look at the list, none of them are better (or more viable ) than she is when it comes to CONSISTENTLY fighting for conservative principles.
But no, I never lied about you at all.