RE: Because you are lying again.
Where did I lie? I never accused you of anything. You’re the one getting personal.
RE: like her politics just fine and have posted so repeatedly, but that doesn’t change the facts of her lack of leadership.
I disagree about her lack of leadership. If the GOP refuses to take her seriously because she ( like Sarah Palin ) is PRINCIPLED a refuses to compromise on it, why should it be held against her?
RE: Your desperation is to keep pretending she is a viable candidate for president,
And your desperation is to ignore what I said IN COMPARISON to the list I gave. I also did mention my preference for Ted Cruz over her but you seem to ignore that too.
How did I lie again by the way?
RE: I don’t agree because I oppose her politics, you are lying when you do that
But I never said you opposed her politics, what I disagree with use is this :
A) You say she isn’t leadership material. I disagree. It is the GOP that refuses to take her seriously.
B) You say she isn’t viable. I ask COMPARED TO WHO?
Then I gave a few names being touted out there. When I look at the list, none of them are better (or more viable ) than she is when it comes to CONSISTENTLY fighting for conservative principles.
But no, I never lied about you at all.
LOL, She has been in elective politics for 15 years, has never displayed leadership, and you think we are all keeping her down and somehow blocking her ability to lead us because her leadership is lying dormant until we skip the part where she has to EARN her political victories, and she gets what? Assigned to the presidency, or to a place of responsibility in the congress, or to a governorship or something?
It is HER job to lead, not for you to explain to us that no one will let her lead them.
I really don’t even know what your obsession is, why are you so determined to create this image of her as a presidential candidate of major stature, or some sort of political leader, instead of her being the wallflower who got her 15 minutes of fame?