1 posted on
07/21/2014 7:06:35 PM PDT by
lowbridge
To: lowbridge
Theyve used the taxpayer money that I have paid them over these years to do this, to be against us. “
It’s always interesting to see the light bulb flicker on.
2 posted on
07/21/2014 7:08:32 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: lowbridge
So we haven't yet acquiesced to socialism?
Well, that would be nice.
3 posted on
07/21/2014 7:09:31 PM PDT by
PapaNew
(Freedom always wins the debate in the forum of ideas)
To: lowbridge
The city spent $200,000 to purchase the fuel storage facility a few years ago, the AP reported, and shelled out another $75,000 to convert the facility into a retail operation.
And that's the problem.
4 posted on
07/21/2014 7:09:40 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: lowbridge
i am for private sector doig this, not gubmint with everyone tax dollars, since this is a service people hardly need the govt selling in.
10 posted on
07/21/2014 7:15:51 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: lowbridge
“The city spent $200,000 to purchase the fuel storage facility a few years ago, the AP reported, and shelled out another $75,000 to convert the facility into a retail operation.”
Also ongoing maintenance, staffing, upkeep.
Saving drivers a few bucks while taking their wallets.
To: lowbridge
If a local town does the business, no one is forced to buy or sell there, and the people, who are close to their government, agree to it - then so what?
Its far different from the Federal Government, who are unaccountable and use coercion, doing such things - THAT is socialism.
18 posted on
07/21/2014 7:34:54 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: lowbridge
25 posted on
07/24/2014 12:02:34 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson