Skip to comments.Child immigrants will not go to Fort Knox
Posted on 07/21/2014 4:34:49 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
LOUISVILLE, Ky. - Sen. Rand Paul said Monday Fort Knox was being considered as a possible place to temporarily house some of the immigrant children pouring across the country's southern border.
The senator's office was notified that the Army post in central Kentucky has been under review as a place to take in an undetermined number of unaccompanied Central America minors.
The Kentucky Republican spoke out against transporting the children to Fort Knox. He says they should be treated humanely until being returned to their home countries.
Late Monday afternoon, Congressman John Yarmuth's office confirmed the Department of Defense submitted Fort Knox to the Department of Health and Human Services as a possible location, but HHS says it is no longer considering using the army base. HHS makes the final decision about which facilities to use to house the children.
(Excerpt) Read more at wkyt.com ...
Might was well send them to Fort Knox, I mean it’s not as if there’s really any gold there taking up space.
The article doesn’t say ‘why’ they are no longer considering sending them to Ft. Knox. I also wouldn’t trust they aren’t still sending them anyway.
District 12 has no say in the matter, Capitol City decides.
Doesn’t look like Zero’s deporting these little lawbreakers either. Could he be ... lying about that?
No law enforcement by the executive branch! Southern border wide open. Impeach!
They can look for the missing gold.
All the Gold, In California,
Is in a bank in the middle of Beverly Hills,
In somebody elses name...
They aren’t “child immigrants”. They are illegal alien invaders.
I’ve said as much ever since I can remember. ..
Not interested. I’d worry about my car getting vandalized.
Francis argued that the problems of the managerial state extend to issues of crime and justice. In 1992, he introduced the word “anarcho-tyranny” into the paleocon vocabulary. He once defined it this way: “we refuse to control real criminals (that’s the anarchy) so we control the innocent (that’s the tyranny).”
In one of his last essays, he explained the concept:
What we have in this country today, then, is both anarchy (the failure of the state to enforce the laws) and, at the same time, tyranny the enforcement of laws by the state for oppressive purposes; the criminalization of the law-abiding and innocent through exorbitant taxation, bureaucratic regulation, the invasion of privacy, and the engineering of social institutions, such as the family and local schools; the imposition of thought control through “sensitivity training” and multiculturalist curricula, “hate crime” laws, gun-control laws that punish or disarm otherwise law-abiding citizens but have no impact on violent criminals who get guns illegally, and a vast labyrinth of other measures. In a word, anarcho-tyranny.
Francis argues that this situation extends across the U.S. and Europe. While the government functions normally, violent crime remains a constant, creating a climate of fear (anarchy). He says that “laws that are supposed to protect ordinary citizens against ordinary criminals” routinely go unenforced, even though the state is “perfectly capable” of doing so. While this problem rages on, government elites concentrate their interests on law-abiding citizens. In fact, Middle America winds up on the receiving end of both anarchy and tyranny.
These jackasses talk like we should be happier than **** about this! We're being INVADED!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.