Sounds so 1930’s doesn’t it?
Don’t worry. We have women and gays on our submarines now. What could possibly go wrong.
Whose interests does it most serve for the USA to be in conflict with Russia again? I suspect it’s neither Russia nor the USA.
If Putin had any balls he would just roll his army into East Ukraine and take it.
We’d better not go back to the Cold War against the Soviets and Red China. We are no way prepared to defend against them now. LePunk in the Hood in DC has destroyed our military and financial status. We don’t have the money and he is cutting back to pre-WWII military status. The Reds will more than have us out numbered. The thing is, neither of them worry about the number of dead troops like we do. They lose thousands and don’t care. We lose 100 and the press and Congress lose their minds. We don’t have the leadership now to defend the nation. Either on the Hill, in the White House or in the Pentagon.
I don’t think there’s any evidence that Putin was deliberately responsible. It seems very doubtful to me. I think this guys is just talking off the top of his head.
I guess we need a beer & wuudka summit.
Angela can provide the bier..
I’m sure Putie has some special reserve stashed away.
Moochelle can cater the event.
Uhm, nope.
They haven’t the numbers nor sufficiently fielded numbers of subs to make a dent in us and they are way behind us technologically.
Sure, why not? Who's to stop him, Obama?
There are far too many warship submarines in the world, and with some countries being belligerent, it will not be long before somebody decides to “cull the herd”.
It won’t be very obvious because “plausible deniability” will be the name of the game. So the effort will be to conceal evidence by using depth, so that a target submarine will first be severely damaged at crush depth, and then be at too great a depth to recover or even investigate.
Oh, yeah. Russia needs more submarines. That’s funny.