mini-Marshall plan?
1 posted on
07/17/2014 12:44:32 AM PDT by
blueplum
To: blueplum
Well before any “mini Marshall plan” we’ll destroy your country. How’s that sound?
2 posted on
07/17/2014 12:52:34 AM PDT by
Ray76
(True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
To: blueplum
Yet another new world order mass flow of cash from us taxpayers to globalist monopolists.
3 posted on
07/17/2014 12:54:01 AM PDT by
PieterCasparzen
(We have to fix things ourselves)
To: blueplum
“Give me your money or you’ll keep getting the kids”. I think I saw something similar in Blazing Saddles.
4 posted on
07/17/2014 12:56:32 AM PDT by
ArmstedFragg
(Hoaxey Dopey Changey)
To: blueplum
We've seen this movie.
5 posted on
07/17/2014 1:01:37 AM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: blueplum
8 posted on
07/17/2014 1:11:30 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
To: blueplum
How 'bout a mini-Hiroshima plan instead?
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
10 posted on
07/17/2014 1:54:05 AM PDT by
wku man
(Veterans, it's up to us to save the Republic...let's roll.)
To: blueplum
As one who spent quite a bit of time in Honduras during the '80s, and as one who watched the complete frigging rebuilding of the infrastructure of the country (roads, bridges, culverts, drainage, wells drilled and water supplies to many many villages), and also came very close to buying a resort in the Black Fly islands off the northern coast, I can say with a completely clear conscience...F**K You Honduras.
Honduras also has the most violent culture in the world right now...stay classy dudes and dudettes.
11 posted on
07/17/2014 2:17:23 AM PDT by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus sum -- "The Taliban is inside the building")
To: blueplum
The foreign aid to Central American should be dependent on the population. As the population shrinks due to the citizens of those countries moving to the US, the aid to those countries should drop. This would be incentive to the countries to keep their citizens, rather than flushing these people North to be the problem of the US.
12 posted on
07/17/2014 2:19:21 AM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
(They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
To: blueplum
Underlying problems? All those countries have the same underlying problems. A few political elites have sized control and maintained a family focused multi-generational cleptocracy, like the Kennedy’s and Clinton’s here. We now have the exact same problem in the US. A Marshal Plan would be pissing money down a rat hole. Here the rat hole is green energy. But there it would just go straight into El Presidente’s bank account.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson