Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America: No longer 1 nation, 1 people
WND ^ | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 07/15/2014 10:21:09 PM PDT by quesney

From 1845-1849, the Irish fleeing the famine. From 1890-1920, the Germans. Then the Italians, Poles, Jews and other Eastern Europeans. Then, immigration was suspended in 1924.

From 1925 to 1965, the children and grandchildren of those immigrants were assimilated, Americanized. In strong public schools, they were taught our language, literature and history, and celebrated our holidays and heroes. We endured together through the Depression and sacrificed together in World War II and the Cold War.

By 1960, we had become truly one nation and one people.

===

We no longer speak the same language, worship the same God, honor the same heroes or share the same holidays. Christmas and Easter have been privatized. Columbus is reviled. Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee are out of the pantheon. Cesar Chavez is in.

Our politics have become poisonous. Our political parties are at each other’s throats.

Christianity is in decline. Traditional churches are sundering over moral issues like abortion and same-sex marriage. Islam is surging.

Our society seems to be disintegrating. Over 40 percent of all births now are illegitimate. Among Hispanics, the figure is 52 percent. Among African-Americans, 73 percent.

And among children born to single moms, the drug use rate and the dropout rate, the crime rate and the incarceration rate, are many times higher than among children born to married parents.

If a country is a land of defined and defended borders, within which resides a people of a common ancestry, history, language, faith, culture and traditions, in what sense are we Americans one nation and one people today?

.... As for what our founding documents mean, even the Supreme Court does not agree.

More and more, 21st-century America seems to meet rather well Metternich’s depiction of Italy – [we're just] “a geographic expression.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: duplicate; makeadonation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: Psiman

Robert E. Lee was one of the finest Americans who ever lived.


61 posted on 07/16/2014 7:51:36 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Robert E. Lee was the US Army officer in charge at the arrest of John Brown.


62 posted on 07/16/2014 7:52:43 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hugin; VerySadAmerican

I believe the Civil War was the price we had to pay in blood for the sin of slavery in a free republic.

That said, my studies say the route to war was not over the issue of slavery itself - but rather the right of individual states to resist an encroaching federal power.

Hinton Rowan Helper’s idea to impose a federal tax on slaves and then cotton itself - was seen as a mechanism to do two things: tax slavery out of existence, and punish states that did not follow Federal dictates - (Obamacare anyone?)

The South saw this as an infringement on their 10th Amendment rights and the argument became centered on Federal power versus State power. It ultimately led to the decision by the Federal beast that states had no right to resist nor secede.

Much of what Robert E. Lee wrote as to the reasons for his refusal to take command of the Union Army corroborate that fact.

When you consider homosexual marriage, ObamaCare and the Alphabet agencies running roughshod over individual and state rights - the precursors to the civil war, are now a precedent for the Federal Beast to do exactly what it did in 1861 - and call out troops to enforce it’s demands if needs be. Wherefore anyone opposing the Federal Beast would be considered a ‘traitor’ and a ‘rebel’.

And such is the rhetoric coming out of the current Federal Beast and the Oligarchy that rules us all.


63 posted on 07/16/2014 8:55:40 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

Don’t you know that no matter what facts you present it makes no difference. Way too many people in this country have minds that are too closed and will never admit when they’re wrong.

Only 3% of the population is gay. Yet 100% is being forced to not only accept it, but to promote it. Gay wedding cakes is an example. Your kids being taught in school that it’s okay to have two mommies is another. And that’s just the beginning.


64 posted on 07/16/2014 10:05:52 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

You might find this book worthwhile:

http://thomasflemingwriter.com/publicmind.html


65 posted on 07/16/2014 10:13:04 AM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Well said.


66 posted on 07/16/2014 10:14:31 AM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Because a Satanic methodology is being implemented against an ignorant people concerned only with their own pleasures.

And it is a methodology that is not new…. it is actually ancient.

The Lord says “My people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge (understanding)” Hosea 4:6 - and so, America today fulfills that scripture.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” - Joseph Goebbels


67 posted on 07/16/2014 10:19:19 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Hugin; Jack Black

“Secession was totally legal.”

Now wait just a minute.

King George III disagreed completely with secession. And so did Leonid Brezhnev in more recent times.


68 posted on 07/16/2014 10:24:53 AM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican; INVAR

Just ignore that “arrow of time flows in one direction” thing and it all will make sense. Sort of.


69 posted on 07/16/2014 10:28:23 AM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

thank you

I am well versed on the real situations of those times


70 posted on 07/16/2014 10:28:45 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

A couple of last points to think about, then I’ll let it rest. I can certainly see how the original southern states felt they had every to secede, since they had joined voluntarily. But what about the western states? With The exception of Texas they were not independent countries that joined the USA voluntarily. They were the creation of the United States government. In the case of Louisiana and Arkansas they would have still been French if the USA hadn’t purchased them.

As far as the Constitution being silent on the issue, the framers were very exacting in designing the Constitution including mechanisms for changing it. It seems to me that their decision not to include a mechanism for states to withdrawal implies that they rejected such a right. If there was a widespread agreement that states could secede, they surely would have made such an allowance explicit.

I really have a lot of sympathy for both sides in the Civil War. My ancestors fought on both sides. I think it’s absurd to call the Southerners who fought for their home states “traitors”. OTOH I don’t buy the neo-Confederate revisionist history that tries to downplay the role of slavery that was clearly at the root of the matter. And I get offended when some (not you) call those who don’t buy their spin “ignorant”.


71 posted on 07/16/2014 12:00:08 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

“I am well versed on the real situations of those times”

I could tell. You’ll enjoy that book’s background on what amounted to a multi-decade propaganda campaign that led to the war.


72 posted on 07/16/2014 1:14:49 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

yes, and isn’t it spooky how history seems to be semi repeating itself , with a few new twists , these days ?

It has always seemed to be the tactic of deceitful presidents
to use immigrant aliens to build up their power and support base ?

can you imagine a whole new army of recently arrived Hispanics to be organized to enforce Obama edicts , or possibly an illegal 3 or 4th term of office , due to
extenuating conditions and circumstances ?

Southerners were right to resist and resist hard , back then ( too bad we lacked good sharp leadership in many cases ) and we will likely resist again when the time comes .


73 posted on 07/16/2014 10:13:24 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

“and isn’t it spooky how history seems to be semi repeating itself”

Must be something about Illinois Presidents.


74 posted on 07/16/2014 11:22:11 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

say!....you’re right !

btw I know who Pelham was and what he did :^)


75 posted on 07/17/2014 1:00:20 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jazzlite

Amen. That is true.


76 posted on 07/19/2014 11:16:44 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Free goodies for all -- Freedom for none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson