Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

So now, we are not allowed to talk about the many negative impacts of young black men growing up without fathers?? That is now racist????

Is it bigoted if we omit race, and say that there are bad impacts for any children growing up without a father? Or will that be seen as bigoted against women and mothers???

Political correctness may yet kill off our civilization.


3 posted on 07/15/2014 6:52:16 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

It’s workin’ hard at it. The list of unacceptable words/phrases/terminology/comments grows bigger every day. Pretty soon when someone asks about your car, you better not say you have a “black” car. Guess that would be interpreted as you have one to make you feel powerful over something black. Lib-logic. I can’t make any sense out of it anymore. Yes, it’s getting that ridiculous. I guess the govt funded data proving what the reporter said will now need to altered to say the opposite.


6 posted on 07/15/2014 6:56:23 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Is it bigoted if we omit race, and say that there are bad impacts for any children growing up without a father?

Yes. It's bigoted because it implies that a 'father' is 'necessary' to rear children properly, which is anathema to the NOW gang.................

23 posted on 07/15/2014 7:36:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,763 threads and 85,286 replies. ...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
They're trying to get rid of words such as "mother" and "father" entirely and all references to specific genders.

So it won't even be possible to say anything meaningful even if you wanted.

"Children growing up with just a single spouse who fails to fully represent the entire gender spectrum will be at a slight disadvantage which might result in angry outbursts directed at symbols of authority."

25 posted on 07/15/2014 7:38:36 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It would be called homophobia because Heather will be just fine with two mommies. If they are legally married in a ‘progressive’ state, of course.


47 posted on 07/15/2014 8:24:52 AM PDT by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It would be called homophobia because Heather will be just fine with two mommies. If they are legally married in a ‘progressive’ state, of course.


49 posted on 07/15/2014 8:28:41 AM PDT by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
So now, we are not allowed to talk about the many negative impacts of young black men growing up without fathers?? That is now racist????

Only a few days ago, Eric Holder said that we need to have more open conversations about race. I guess those open conversations mean your opinions have to be PC and/or devoid of truth.

50 posted on 07/15/2014 9:38:59 AM PDT by randita ("Is a nation without borders a nation?"...Noonan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson