“They also are considering new ammunition, which has sparked considerable debate among military and civilian weapons experts, too.”
Interesting. I’m far from an expert, but it’s my understanding that one of the biggest “knockdown” issues here is the military requirement to use FMJ ammo rather than hollow-point or other expanding rounds. It would be interesting to see what they are debating when it comes to ammunition.
As for a replacement...again, I’m not an expert, but I would think a modern pistol chambered in .45 ACP would fit the bill. Especially if they make a magazine that holds more than 7 or 8 rounds for it.
“As for a replacement...again, I’m not an expert, but I would think a modern pistol chambered in .45 ACP would fit the bill. Especially if they make a magazine that holds more than 7 or 8 rounds for it.”
Well, I’m a 1911 guy; packed one everyday while in the army and now own two and often carry when I feel the need. But, designing a magazine capacity beyond seven or eight rounds will require the double stack configuration. The problem with the double stack is that the grip has to be pretty thick causing it to be unwieldy for small males and most women. Personally, when making choices, I prefer the knock down punch of the 45acp and less capacity vs less punch (requiring the double tap technique) and more capacity. Btw, if one does the math, a 15 round 9mm pistol being fired using double tap nets out to same number of take downs as a 7 round 45acp. Besides, hide and watch; new design will require politically correct double/double configuration which sucks - badly....
The M1911 .45 was used forever and did the trick
If I am not mistaken, hollow points are not allowed per Geneva Convention. Which makes the gov’s purchase of billions of hp rounds more interesting.
If I am not mistaken, hollow points are not allowed per Geneva Convention. Which makes the gov’s purchase of billions of hp rounds more interesting.