To: Elsie
In all reality we should stop this nonsense and stick with ONE time. To change the clocks twice a year is ridiculous and a waste of time and money. It is archaic, stupid, confusing idea. It is also false that it saves energy resources.
3 posted on
07/11/2014 9:30:45 AM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Jim from C-Town
Ding, ding, ding.... We a a winner!
4 posted on
07/11/2014 9:32:19 AM PDT by
AFreeBird
To: Jim from C-Town
I'm with you. Year round daylight savings time or year round standard time, I really don't care which. Pick one and stick with it.
It might be more palatable even if you have to draw half hour time zones. New England and the Atlantic Seaboard can be Eastern time. Pittsburgh, Ohio and points to the north and south can be a half hour earlier and be called East Central time or whatever. And so forth.
Calling it daylight savings time is stupid anyway because it doesn't save any daylight, it just moves it. There is a certain economic argument for daylight savings time because more people get up late than get up early. But call it something else.
5 posted on
07/11/2014 9:57:36 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson