Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage
A court order might mandate a review in camera, if the real concern is voter privacy.
16 posted on 07/10/2014 9:43:12 AM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Kennard

Good point! I imagine McDaniel’s and TTV’s attorneys would think to bring that up before the judge to take away the issue of voter privacy from the defendants.

But I also imagine the attorneys are overwhelmed as they have stated to the press that they are overwhelmed and are continuing to be overwhelmed with the volume and quality of the fraud evidence coming at them.

So I will try to get your point before them just in case it gets lost in the noise.


19 posted on 07/10/2014 10:23:00 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Kennard

Tell me how that could be managed. Wouldn’t a court balk at a review of thousands and thousands of voters information inside its court room or could there be a facility under watchful eyes of the court where the materials could be brought and reviewd?


21 posted on 07/10/2014 10:41:35 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson