I don’t know. I think Ann may be correct.
I wish she’d make her points better, though.
I thought McDaniel had a good chance of a new election. That’s what I’d base the decision on. If it’s not likely I’d give up. If it can get done I’d go for it.
If Cochran emerges from this unscathed, this will become the default standard for the GOP-E to put down the Tea Party. Stopping this crap in its tracks is far more important than one Senate seat.
ltc8k6 wrote:
<<
I don’t know. I think Ann may be correct.
>>
************************************************************
Really? How so??
If the runoff election had been decided by REPUBLICAN voters, then Thad Cochran would’ve easily LOST the race, hands down. But instead of backing a bold, charasmatic, conservative, loyal, lifelong Republican like Chris McDaniel, the GOP establishment instead pulls out all the stops to keep their “good ole boy network” intact by spending millions of dollars to smear the Tea Party and play the race card against McDaniel in order to scare black Democrat voters into voting for a senile old senator with no core principles who’s been in Washington for WAY too long. And let me remind you that it is ILLEGAL according to Mississsippi law for voters who’ve already voted in their own party primary race to cast a vote in another party’s primary race!
Ann Coulter can go to hell for all I care. I’m so sick and tired of that has-been and I hope McDaniel fights this thing until the bitter end!
Correct? So you think it’s okay that Cochran won through fraudulently voting Dems, race baiting ads and buying votes? Every time someone ignores things like this, another candidate will think it’s okay to use such tactics. The GOP hurt themselves.