This former POW is a hard leftist liberal. To me, he surrenders any default respect and cover he gets by supporting the extreme liberal agenda which is deliberately destructive to the United States.
The fact that he cannot distinguish the circumstances of Bergdahl’s capture completely invalidates anything he has to say on the subject.
I think most humane and compassionate people might adjust their stance (or at least expose it to considerable reflection) on negotiating with those people if it was a person captured against his will while doing his job.
I don’t think there is any dishonor in opposing this swap in every single way, shape, or form, due to the circumstances surrounding his desertion.
I agree with you except he can distinguish between captured or deserted. He just won’t.
Look the man spent over 2000 days in a POW camp. That will screw up your mind.
He is wrong. Very very wrong. But his head is screwed up.
Yeah i know. I am being generous.