Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dervish

The only thing the Wheaton College injunction says is that an exempt employer MAY not be required to file a certain form with the US government. Until the issue (is a certain form required) is resolved, the government should consider themselves notified and take whatever action they deem appropriate.

It does not impact the employer mandate or birth control in any way - regardless of the mass hysteria among the Uterus Uber Alles crowd on the Supreme Court!


7 posted on 07/06/2014 8:51:36 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

I don’t understand your point. IMO this is a big deal.

SCOTUS enjoined enforcement of the birth control mandate pending outcome of Wheaton’s appeal.

Morrissey makes the point, and rightly so, that the Accommodation which Obamacare gave to employers with religious objections is not a done deal.


26 posted on 07/06/2014 5:00:36 PM PDT by dervish (petbully lover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

Wapo also thinks this means a SCOTUS majority has serious reservations about the accommodation and the employer mandate for birth control.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/07/06/more-on-what-the-wheaton-college-injunction-does-and-does-not-mean-for-contraception-coverage/

also

http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2012/december/wheaton-college-wins-major-victory-against-hhs.html?paging=off


27 posted on 07/06/2014 5:07:20 PM PDT by dervish (petbully lover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson