Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton Shows She Has No Idea What the Hobby Lobby Ruling Was About
Life Site News ^
| July 1, 2014
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 07/01/2014 2:41:30 PM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
07/01/2014 2:41:30 PM PDT
by
NYer
To: wagglebee; little jeremiah
2
posted on
07/01/2014 2:42:01 PM PDT
by
NYer
("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
To: NYer
To: Sacajaweau
4
posted on
07/01/2014 2:43:30 PM PDT
by
molson209
(Blank)
To: NYer
She just tard from selling books.
To: NYer
NYER remember back in da day they say she was smartest woman ever remember that
NOW I don’t think so
6
posted on
07/01/2014 2:44:13 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
(We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
To: NYer
Wait a minute. I remember reading in the 90s that she was a super smart Yale lawyer. She is a brilliant Constitutional scholar like Obama. How can she not understand this? It must be a mistake . . .
7
posted on
07/01/2014 2:45:22 PM PDT
by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: NYer
The front runner for 2016?? Come on, she is as much as a front runner as Connecticut's Dan Malloy is...
Let's have the 2014 elections before the 2016.
8
posted on
07/01/2014 2:46:21 PM PDT
by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
To: NYer
It doesn't matter what the decision actually said.
She's sticking to the party line -- to the interpretation that best benefits her side and her own candidacy.
9
posted on
07/01/2014 2:48:27 PM PDT
by
x
To: NYer
To: NYer
It really makes you wonder how she might answer a series of questions about the details of 0bamacare. (snicker....)
11
posted on
07/01/2014 2:49:33 PM PDT
by
NEMDF
To: SevenofNine
I really think she should just retire and save herself further embarrassment, it’s becoming obvious she is physically not a well woman...
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Wait a minute. I remember reading in the 90s that she was a super smart Yale lawyer. She is a brilliant Constitutional scholar like Obama. How can she not understand this? It must be a mistake . . .
She's interpreting the decision in the way that best suits her own interests, regardless of the facts. That's what politicians do. Probably she didn't even read the decision.
13
posted on
07/01/2014 2:50:21 PM PDT
by
x
To: NYer
Liberals use abortion as post-impregnation contraception.
14
posted on
07/01/2014 2:50:45 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: NYer
I haven’t seen any liberal that really understands what the Hobby Lobby ruling was all about.
15
posted on
07/01/2014 2:53:01 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Jeff Head
Shouldn’t that be “dead broke” ?
16
posted on
07/01/2014 2:53:01 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: NYer
“What difference at this point does it make”
17
posted on
07/01/2014 2:53:52 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
To: NYer
I doubt she even knows what day it is. But then again - What difference does it make?
To: SevenofNine
NYER remember back in da day they say she was smartest woman ever remember that NOW I dont think so Ironically, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that the government's contraception mandate as applied to closely held corporations was a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1993. So a Bill Clinton-era law is what was essentially struck down here, and Mrs. Clinton's out ripping the law! She's ripping her husband's own legislation, not knowing it.
19
posted on
07/01/2014 2:54:01 PM PDT
by
NYer
("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
To: smokingfrog
I havent seen any liberal that really understands what the Hobby Lobby ruling was all about. It's not about the substance of the ruling, but the "seriousness of the accusations"...
20
posted on
07/01/2014 2:54:24 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson