Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama weighs executive hammer (on SC Hobby Lobby decision)
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/211022-obama-weighs-executive-hammer ^

Posted on 07/01/2014 10:57:34 AM PDT by chessplayer

President Obama is weighing executive actions after the Supreme Court ruled against ObamaCare’s contraception mandate.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: tanknetter

The current mantra of the Left is that women will now be denied contraception and are going to die.


Not only that, but they are saying the Hobby Lobby decision will bring back Jim Crow and slavery. Not making that up. Thats what they are actually saying.


21 posted on 07/01/2014 11:40:54 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

America is infected with a fatal case of Normalcy Bias and willful cognitive dissonance when it comes to the fact that Americans live under a Dictatorship via a MarxoFascist Oligarchy.

The longer they abide it - the harder it will be to overcome it or survive it.


22 posted on 07/01/2014 11:42:34 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
It's a good thing so many people sat out the 2012 election rather than vote for a Mormon because otherwise we wouldn't have such a fine, dedicated, fascist SOB as President to save us from the rule of law.

/sarc, just in case it's needed

23 posted on 07/01/2014 11:43:02 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Since he won’t abide by the Constitution, he needs to be relieved of his job which is supposed to uphold the Constitution.


24 posted on 07/01/2014 11:47:43 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Surely, no FReeper “thinks” that the very same Treasury that receives billions in income tax payments every single day, and that sells billions of IOUs every single day, will say:

“Gee, we can’t spend ANY of this money unless the House of Representatives PERMITS us to”.


25 posted on 07/01/2014 11:49:34 AM PDT by pfony1 (Add just 6 GOP Senators and we "bury" Harry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Just who is going to “relieve” him of this position? The HOR and Senate? Sure - when hell freezes over.


26 posted on 07/01/2014 11:51:32 AM PDT by Catsrus (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

This is just for show, playing to the base and trying to revive the “war on women” meme.


27 posted on 07/01/2014 11:55:23 AM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Yeah, that really isn’t a biggie for Obammie. He’ll just “borrow” some of the Supreme Court’s authority and do as he damn well pleases. Constitution? Obama doesn’t need no stinken Constitution. Dictators usually don’t.


28 posted on 07/01/2014 12:06:03 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
He always says something like this after a setback but then never pursues it. He is just grandstanding for the media and the base.

I wouldn't be so sure. Obama knows that it takes several years before one of his Executive Orders finally makes it onto a court docket to be challenged in court. He's simply going to issue EO after EO in a fit of manchild rage for the next two and a half years.

In the meantime, good ol' Johnboy Boehner had a lawsuit ready to file. Gee, don't we feel so much better now knowing that Boehner's gonna file a lawsuit instead of IMPEACHING Obama's ass like he should?

29 posted on 07/01/2014 12:09:08 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Can anyone imagine the outrage from the left if George W. Bush had done this?
30 posted on 07/01/2014 12:12:22 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel

I like it!!


31 posted on 07/01/2014 12:12:50 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

“The White House swiftly called on Congress to enact a legislative fix but realistically knows lawmakers aren’t about to act.”

Glad to see the WH can act swiftly on the really important issues./s


32 posted on 07/01/2014 12:17:41 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

The Narcissist is not pleased. Hold on to your hats, folks. It’s going to get crazier. Read about Narcissist Rage and Narcissistic Injury:
http://samvak.tripod.com/journal86.html

Narcissism, Psychopathy and Evil: http://mindexpressions.wordpress.com/narcissism-psychopathy-evil/

“A person who is truly narcissistic will respond with extreme anger if s/he receives a challenge to her ego (an ego that is both fragile, and strongly defended). This response may look like an overblown rage fit, following a minor slight; or it may take the form of a cold vindictiveness, administered by acts of retaliation. These responses can be very shocking, even frightening, to the person who unwittingly triggered or evoked the narcissistic injury (by getting in the way of the narcissist’s plans, for example, or by displaying a lack of full approval and appreciation for the narcissist’s brilliant ideas).”


33 posted on 07/01/2014 12:32:59 PM PDT by fivecatsandadog (OBAMA ..IMPEACH, REMOVE, AND IMPRISON NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

This is a fight I would like to see him pick.


34 posted on 07/01/2014 12:34:59 PM PDT by The Duke ("Forgiveness is between them and God, it's my job to arrange the meeting.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

In the words of one lib I know, “Those mean republicans have been blocking Obama forever, just what he is supposed to do??”

My response of “FOLLOW THE LAW, and the United States Constitution” didn’t sink in with it. The TV programming is just too strong, and this is a well-educated person that should have known better.


35 posted on 07/01/2014 12:42:54 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
I wish people would calm down about these 'executive order's' they are meaningless.

No President can create a law with executive action, no American is required to follow it!

36 posted on 07/01/2014 12:50:43 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
I’m sure Boner is readying his pen for a strongly worded letter.

First you'll have to get him out of the bar and sober him up.

37 posted on 07/01/2014 12:54:11 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ("Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle?" - Patrick Henry, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Ben Shapiro of Breitbart nailed it.

Breitbart: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/16/Obama-con-law-III

Back when President Obama was lecturer Obama at the University of Chicago Law School, he gave final exams in constitutional law . . .

“This presents a question: is there a constitutional right to cloning?” . . . So here’s what we’ve learned: Obama believes that the right to privacy should encompass everything up to and including cloning; he thinks that religious morality must be struck down by courts when implemented in law, even though it is supported by thousands of years of tradition; he believes that the state has no interest in family formation; he wants the state to implement morality only when it is his morality.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/14/Obama-Con-Law-1996-I

“The question deals with a hypothetical lesbian couple that wants to have a baby. Their state prevents health providers from providing infertility treatments for unwed couples; the couple’s state-provided healthcare therefore refuses them coverage for such procedures” . . . Here’s what we learn from this answer: Obama’s an extreme legal leftist. He thinks that banning infertility treatment for unwed couples is akin to sterilizing them. He thinks that there is no connection between childbearing and childrearing and the integral value of marriage. He thinks that arguments about “tradition” are troubling. And he believes that all judges rule according to their experiences – which goes a long way toward explaining his love for Sonia Sotomayor, whose “wise Latina” experiences may shape her judicial reasoning, according to her own admission.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/15/Obama-con-law-II

“This question concerns a fictional “Mayor Dudley Duright,” the first African-American mayor of Wazoo City. The population of the city is 50 percent black and 50 percent white, and highly segregated” . . . Lecturer Obama believed deeply in Critical Race Theory – so much so that he advocated creative legal strategies to argue Critical Race Theory into law. He thought that facially neutral statutes were discriminatory thanks to the racism of the system. He even argued that the people of the states be stripped of their power to change local law, if such changes cut against narrow minority interests.


38 posted on 07/01/2014 1:29:14 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

Obama ran as a moderate and he’s governing as a dictator wannabee. What color is the sky in your world?


39 posted on 07/01/2014 2:40:14 PM PDT by GOPJ (Why no outrage over IRS targeting? Same reason Pravda didn't make a stink about gulags.FREnterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

To paraphrase him during both elections: Energy prices will necessarily skyrocket. If you open a coal plant I’ll shut it down. I’ll fight for national healthcare. I will fundamentally change America. I will sand with muslims.

obama told us exactly what he was going to do to this country. The GOPe coli didn’t stop him.


40 posted on 07/01/2014 2:49:18 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson