Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau

I heard on radio this morning that liberal pundits were pointing out that the decision came out on the gender divide.

Their conclusion is that, basically, it is about the mens’ war on women.

That is such a lie.

What the gender split on the ruling actually suggests is that it is more likely that a hedonistic liberal woman will seek and find a highly visible judgeship (unseating the traditional man’s role) in today’s culture (or lack thereof) than one who is a God-fearing conservative.

The God fearing women just aren’t seeking to overturn tradition. Nor are they being sought by the powers that be for traditionally male roles today. (Acceptions permitting.)


17 posted on 07/01/2014 6:44:17 AM PDT by Repent and Believe (Promote good. Tolerate the harmless. Let evil be crushed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Repent and Believe
Can someone explain to these women that they don't have babies without males....

and that males have an interest in their children.

The there's sickos and sheep like Obama that think baby killing is a good thing.

Stop having sex ladies and you want have inconvenient babies!!

19 posted on 07/01/2014 7:32:25 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson