Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Obama to Look at How He Can Act on His Own to Mitigate Contraception Mandate Ruling
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/06/30/breaking-obama-to-look-at-how-he-can-act-on-his-own-after-contraception-ruling-n1857370?utm_source=BreakingOnTownhallWidget_4&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=BreakingOnTownhall ^

Posted on 06/30/2014 9:57:43 PM PDT by chessplayer

Again, Hobby Lobby offers coverage for 16 different types of contraception

for its employees. The only thing President Obama will be mitigating is politics and faux war on women rhetoric.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
He has a pen and a phone. I knew he wouldn't accept the SC decision. He's laughing at them and telling them to f-off.
1 posted on 06/30/2014 9:57:43 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

And I dont accept obamacare as law. FUBO


2 posted on 06/30/2014 9:59:02 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Ubama gives fascist dictators a bad name.


3 posted on 06/30/2014 10:00:06 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

That’s our emperor for ya.


4 posted on 06/30/2014 10:00:12 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

What’s his problem with the ruling? He has been primarily concerned with queers, and they can’t get themselves pregnant.


5 posted on 06/30/2014 10:01:41 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Why do we have a legislature? Why, again a Supreme Court. I mean, really, why bother?


6 posted on 06/30/2014 10:04:01 PM PDT by cld51860 (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

What’s his problem with the ruling? He has been primarily concerned with queers, and they can’t get themselves pregnant.


I just heard on the radio that he had a big LTBG party at the White House tonight.


7 posted on 06/30/2014 10:04:26 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Obama is doubling down here. The abortifacient mandate wasn't passed by Congress -- Obama bypassed Congress in order to manufacture the mandate. Now Obama wants to work around the Supreme Court, which determined that Obama's mandate violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when he created the abortifacient mandate.

Can't wait until we get a Republican in the White House and the press starts to care about Separation of Powers again.

8 posted on 06/30/2014 10:04:41 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Hugo’s son is also a dictator


9 posted on 06/30/2014 10:06:43 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

What could he possibly be thinking of, some way to offer those poor deprived Hobby Lobby workers an ultra sweet deal on the Plan B pills at taxpayer expense? Without, of course, any law being passed by Congress for it... maybe he doesn’t NEED one. There is enough Calvinball within the Pea Packer Act to do it.


10 posted on 06/30/2014 10:08:52 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Hope the new President laughs at them for how predictably banal they are.


11 posted on 06/30/2014 10:09:48 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

And the Leftists applaud...

The Left is the enemy of the Constitution.


12 posted on 06/30/2014 10:10:33 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

He declared the Defense of Marriage Act null and void. He will do the same with the Hobby Lobby decision.


13 posted on 06/30/2014 10:21:32 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Obama could always “borrow” some of the Supreme Court’s authority to do what he wants to do anyway.


14 posted on 06/30/2014 10:23:21 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Wonder when Obama will apologize for blocking Pres Bush’s political agenda after all Pres Bush won the election and should have been able to enact all his policies...


15 posted on 06/30/2014 10:31:02 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Narcissis: “I love you.”
Echo: “I love you.”

I wonder if anyone ever said “No.” to this bird in his life.


16 posted on 06/30/2014 10:54:21 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Why would Obama want to overturn Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby? It's the law of the land. If Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby can be overturned, can't Obamacare be repealed?
17 posted on 06/30/2014 11:04:04 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I’m beginning to wonder if this all hasn’t been a ruse. SC makes a ruling wildly unpopular with the Low Info crowd, since they’ve been led to believe it applies to reducing access to ALL birth control. While they are riled up, he promises to FIX IT with a pen and a phone. He’s their hero! “Thank goodness for caring President Obama!” Once again he negates the separation of powers. And the libs have another War on Women sign to carry in the 2016 election. The media has deliberately, over and over, said this was about contraception. It’s not.


18 posted on 06/30/2014 11:27:03 PM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Maybe he should get a vasectomy.

I am so tired of this damn sh!t.

IT IS NO ONE’S RESPONSIBILITY TO PAY FOR SOMEONE ELSE’S FRICKIN’ BIRTH CONTROL.

Piss off, Barry.


19 posted on 06/30/2014 11:37:44 PM PDT by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

FACTUALLY SPEAKING, ITS ABOUT ABORTION INDUCING DRUGS USED AFTER CONCEPTION AND CLAIMED TO BE ‘CONTRACEPTION’ BY THE LEFT WING ACTIVISTS, LEFT WING POLITICIANS AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WITHOUT ANYONE CHALLENGING THEM.


20 posted on 06/30/2014 11:46:33 PM PDT by Nextrush (OBAMACARE IS A BAILOUT FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson