To: NYer
Good summary. While today's court decision was drawn along very narrow lines, I believe they've opened an enormous hole in the ObamaCare mandate for many private employers. In this particular case one of the employers did not object to providing contraceptive coverage in general (only abortifacients), but the court's exact same reasoning would apply to another employer whose religious morals dictated that no coverage for contraceptives could be provided.
8 posted on
06/30/2014 4:38:13 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
To: Alberta's Child
Good summary. While today's court decision was drawn along very narrow lines, I believe they've opened an enormous hole in the ObamaCare mandate for many private employers. In this particular case one of the employers did not object to providing contraceptive coverage in general (only abortifacients), but the court's exact same reasoning would apply to another employer whose religious morals dictated that no coverage for contraceptives could be provided. One of the holes would seem, in the opinion of this non-professional observer, to be that people will not be treated equally under this (tax) law.
Yes, Justice Roberts created a mess.
15 posted on
06/30/2014 4:52:12 PM PDT by
IncPen
(None of this would be happening if John Boehner were alive...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson