Watch the video. Discuss...................
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Red Badger
Let me see your ID or you will be arrested for failing to provide ID. Papieren, schwein!
37 posted on
06/30/2014 3:01:24 PM PDT by
IronJack
To: Red Badger
I didn’t know it was against the law to walk in a street without an ID. What if one of those disenfranchised people that can’t get an ID to vote had to walk in the street to get to the polls?
To: Red Badger
The cop is mentally unbalanced.
52 posted on
06/30/2014 3:23:28 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Red Badger
From the ASU Directory Profile
Assistant professor.
Research Interests:
Contemproary(sic) Rhetorical Theory, Race Critical Theory, Rhetorics of Race & Culture, Composition, Visual and Material Culture Studies.
African American Rhetoric.
64 posted on
06/30/2014 3:58:35 PM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
To: Red Badger
John Whitehead wrote a commentary documenting the decisions that put the U.S. Supreme Court in lockstep with a coming police state, for The Rutherford Institute. This is a partial quote from his commentary:
Its a crime to not identify yourself when a policeman asks your name. In Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada (2004), a majority of the high court agreed that refusing to answer when a policeman asks Whats your name? can rightfully be considered a crime under Nevadas stop and identify statute. No longer will Americans, even those not suspected of or charged with any crime, have the right to remain silent when stopped and questioned by a police officer.
The cases the Supreme Court refuses to hear, allowing lower court judgments to stand, are almost as critical as the ones they rule on. Some of these cases, turned away in recent years alone, have delivered devastating blows to the rights enshrined in the Constitution.
[The italics are mine.]
65 posted on
06/30/2014 3:58:46 PM PDT by
righttackle44
(Take scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
To: Red Badger
I side with the woman. The Cop was an arrogant pr*ck.
And since when in America can they demand “Papers” to prove your identity?
We are becoming more totalitarian by the day.
66 posted on
06/30/2014 4:18:48 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
(Partus Sequitur Patrem)
To: Red Badger
The cops could save themselves so much trouble if they’d just leave people who aren’t hurting anyone alone. Just back off. Let people live their lives.
Is this an impossible dream?
67 posted on
06/30/2014 4:21:27 PM PDT by
DManA
To: Red Badger
She was fortunate that he did not kill her.
72 posted on
06/30/2014 4:32:14 PM PDT by
sport
To: Red Badger
I'm calling out all of you "follow the rules" folks. Please defend the female cop, who is after all just enforcing the law.
76 posted on
06/30/2014 4:51:24 PM PDT by
Jabba the Nutt
(You can have a free country or government schools. Choose one.)
To: Red Badger
The cop got way out of hand but the woman should not have been resisting arrest. They are both assholes. The difference is the cop is a public servant and is trained (supposedly) to deal with jerks.
To: Red Badger; Alaska Wolf; TexasFreeper2009; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; ...
JBT Ping list
![](http://www.bottomsupcomic.com/comics/2009-08-12-Cavity-Search.jpg)
92 posted on
06/30/2014 8:34:21 PM PDT by
null and void
(If Bill Clinton was the first black president, why isn't Barack Obama the first woman president?)
To: Red Badger
The process is the punishment. Even if the prosecutor drops all the charges later, it doesn’t unslam you from the pavement.
95 posted on
06/30/2014 9:19:13 PM PDT by
Valpal1
(If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
The request for the ID seemed unnecessary, but it’s required to issue a summons.
The individual’s refusal to cooperate caused the aggravation. I’m having a hard time finding fault with the LEOs on this one.
97 posted on
06/30/2014 11:17:12 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Red Badger
Just think this is in Arizona where at the very same time the police are ignoring all the illegals flooding their state, but then harassing citizens for jay walking???
To: Red Badger
English professor, huh.
The cop should have tazed her too.
To: Red Badger
“Officer, I told you my name. If you arrest me for failure to provide ID, as though Americans need licenses to walk, you will be in violation of the Constitution as defined by the Supreme Court in Kolender v. Lawson. Not that I would mind—that should result in a very lucrative lawsuit against the department and yourself personally. But I thought I’d warn you...”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolender_v._Lawson
122 posted on
07/04/2014 7:22:16 AM PDT by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: Red Badger
“What part of “NO Jaywalking” do you not understand, peasant?!” /s;)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson