Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Watch the video. Discuss...................
1 posted on 06/30/2014 2:17:27 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Red Badger
“Let me see your ID or you will be arrested for failing to provide ID.”

Papieren, schwein!

37 posted on 06/30/2014 3:01:24 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I didn’t know it was against the law to walk in a street without an ID. What if one of those disenfranchised people that can’t get an ID to vote had to walk in the street to get to the polls?


46 posted on 06/30/2014 3:13:01 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The cop is mentally unbalanced.


52 posted on 06/30/2014 3:23:28 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

From the ASU Directory Profile

Assistant professor.

Research Interests:

Contemproary(sic) Rhetorical Theory, Race Critical Theory, Rhetorics of Race & Culture, Composition, Visual and Material Culture Studies.

African American Rhetoric.


64 posted on 06/30/2014 3:58:35 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
John Whitehead wrote a commentary documenting the decisions that put the U.S. Supreme Court in lockstep with a coming police state, for The Rutherford Institute. This is a partial quote from his commentary:

It’s a crime to not identify yourself when a policeman asks your name. In Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada (2004), a majority of the high court agreed that refusing to answer when a policeman asks “What’s your name?” can rightfully be considered a crime under Nevada’s “stop and identify” statute. No longer will Americans, even those not suspected of or charged with any crime, have the right to remain silent when stopped and questioned by a police officer.

The cases the Supreme Court refuses to hear, allowing lower court judgments to stand, are almost as critical as the ones they rule on. Some of these cases, turned away in recent years alone, have delivered devastating blows to the rights enshrined in the Constitution.

[The italics are mine.]
65 posted on 06/30/2014 3:58:46 PM PDT by righttackle44 (Take scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I side with the woman. The Cop was an arrogant pr*ck.

And since when in America can they demand “Papers” to prove your identity?

We are becoming more totalitarian by the day.


66 posted on 06/30/2014 4:18:48 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The cops could save themselves so much trouble if they’d just leave people who aren’t hurting anyone alone. Just back off. Let people live their lives.

Is this an impossible dream?


67 posted on 06/30/2014 4:21:27 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

She was fortunate that he did not kill her.


72 posted on 06/30/2014 4:32:14 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
I'm calling out all of you "follow the rules" folks. Please defend the female cop, who is after all just enforcing the law.
76 posted on 06/30/2014 4:51:24 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (You can have a free country or government schools. Choose one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The cop got way out of hand but the woman should not have been resisting arrest. They are both assholes. The difference is the cop is a public servant and is trained (supposedly) to deal with jerks.


90 posted on 06/30/2014 7:48:52 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; Alaska Wolf; TexasFreeper2009; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; ...
JBT Ping list


92 posted on 06/30/2014 8:34:21 PM PDT by null and void (If Bill Clinton was the first black president, why isn't Barack Obama the first woman president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The process is the punishment. Even if the prosecutor drops all the charges later, it doesn’t unslam you from the pavement.


95 posted on 06/30/2014 9:19:13 PM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The request for the ID seemed unnecessary, but it’s required to issue a summons.

The individual’s refusal to cooperate caused the aggravation. I’m having a hard time finding fault with the LEOs on this one.


97 posted on 06/30/2014 11:17:12 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Just think this is in Arizona where at the very same time the police are ignoring all the illegals flooding their state, but then harassing citizens for jay walking???


106 posted on 07/01/2014 6:24:56 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

English professor, huh.

The cop should have tazed her too.


119 posted on 07/03/2014 10:47:30 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“Officer, I told you my name. If you arrest me for failure to provide ID, as though Americans need licenses to walk, you will be in violation of the Constitution as defined by the Supreme Court in Kolender v. Lawson. Not that I would mind—that should result in a very lucrative lawsuit against the department and yourself personally. But I thought I’d warn you...”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolender_v._Lawson


122 posted on 07/04/2014 7:22:16 AM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“What part of “NO Jaywalking” do you not understand, peasant?!” /s;)


124 posted on 09/17/2015 4:07:08 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson