A pack of condoms costs less than the six pack it takes to do the easy Sandra flukes of today.
Posted on 06/30/2014 10:05:44 AM PDT by don-o
WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House says women's health will be jeopardized by a Supreme Court's decision that allows corporations with religious objections to opt out of a requirement that they cover contraceptives.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Monday that women should make personal health decisions for themselves.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...
Abortion lovers are in mourning today
Yes, and with their own money too.
Women are free to make their own decisions up to the point where their decisions conflict with the freedom of choice of the people that are paying the bill.
It is the same rationale where my right to swing my arm ends where the other person's nose begins.
Keep your bedroom out of my freedom!
Murdering babies comes under the rubrick of “women’s health”, in their twisted world.
GOD he is such a big baby when he doesn't get his way.
Oh, they’re not shy about coming right out and saying that much. Because they worship “Gaia”. Yet they have the nerve to point fingers at Christians.
Ditto, well said.
“White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Monday that women should make personal health decisions for themselves.”
Ok?
Now you can do it with your own money, like a big girl.
A pack of condoms costs less than the six pack it takes to do the easy Sandra flukes of today.
LOL that’s not what the court said or did.
The court only [and by a 5-4 !] allowed corporations with religious objections to offer 16 contraceptive methods instead of 18.
Why is the left so upset?
Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th Time Since 2012
Obama has been overturned in more than 2/3rd the cases before the US Supreme Court.
Love it! Succintly and well said! Going on my list of “quotables”.
+1
What a bunch of drama queens. Taking abortifacients jeopardizes a baby’s health and in some case the woman’s health. When it comes to contraceptives, does obamacare cover condoms? If not, is this discrimination against men, against homosexuals?
Why is the govt inserting their noses in individuals sexual activities? Why not cover Viagra?
This is all about buying women’s votes.
I’m confused.
What is the “contraceptive” issue here?
Are they referring to Trojans, morning after pills, abortion, or all of the above?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Is my employer denying me the right to eat because it doesn’t give me free groceries?
Here’s an idea Obama....
Maybe you could use your damned pen and phone to order the FDA to make Birth Control pills OTC (over the Counter) that way the price of the birth control pills would be the same price of an aspirin and if a woman wanted to chose aspirin as a birth control method she could buy a bottle of them and put on between her knees OR she could buy a bottle of birth control pills for the SAME PRICE and take one like one normally takes an Aspirin and it would cost THE SAME!!!
But no, because that would acknowledge that Women like me actually have an actual choice over what we want to take vs. their argument that Sugar Daddy government knows best....
And it would totally take away the idiot lib arguments for women that need to take it to treat other conditions like PCOS etc...
Because the Idiot Libs LOVE the FDA and the control it has over our lives and are using the FDA to keep certain drug prices high so they can use it as a leverage point in their little “class warfare struggle”.
Because if Birth Control pills were Over the Counter, NO INSURANCE POLICY UNDER OBUMMER CARE WOULD HAVE TO COVER THEM....
Wouldn’t take long unless Obama was interrupt during golf game LOL!
This White House does nothing for anyone but itself
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
