“Rush. Women prolly got the idea that they shouldnt have to pay for their contraceptives when they saw that viagra was being covered by insurance.”
There is a major difference between the 2 items. First, contracaptives PREVENT a healthy system from performing. Second, Viagra ALLOWS an UNhealthy system to perform. In other words, one destroys, the other fixes.
Besides that, Viagra was originally under development as a different type of medication, if my memory serves it was blood pressure medicine. The current use was originally an “unfortunate” side effect of the medication. It was almost tossed on the scrap heap....just as an fyi.
Don’t fall for the lefties moral equivelance to get their “state funded abortions” on demand.
True. But that reasoning will never fly with women. Just sayin. I get your point-I agree but it’ll never fly. Sorry.
Bottom line is why should we fix YOUR flat tire?
We generally do but should you expect it? Should it be codified into law?
I agre, but wish neither were paid for. Nor birthing expenses. My attitude is, if I don’t get to participate in the conception, I don’t want to pay the bill.
As for viagra on the head, they found it worked, but the hair just stood straight up.
Rush, True, the man difference between 2010 and now is that the GOP has actively accomodated the democrats and fought against their conservative base. There will be many of us that will not vote for the GOP supported candidate.