Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Court Sides With Hobby Lobby
Townhall ^
| Jun 30, 2014
| Christine Rousselle
Posted on 06/30/2014 7:24:29 AM PDT by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: crosslink
Another freedom to celebrate this week !
41
posted on
06/30/2014 7:44:36 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
To: george76; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
42
posted on
06/30/2014 7:44:49 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: SeekAndFind
So, who controls the Senate might matter?
To: exit82
Also, Lord, bless the owners of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties.
They took a stand against tremendous odds because they would not deny You.
Bless their businesses and make them prosper.
44
posted on
06/30/2014 7:45:52 AM PDT
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: headstamp 2; george76; BuckeyeTexan
I hope the 5 have good security.....
45
posted on
06/30/2014 7:47:09 AM PDT
by
GregNH
(If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
To: LS
The broader question was not before them, I read part of the decision. It specifically states that they are not ruling, today, on the broadly held corporations.
46
posted on
06/30/2014 7:47:12 AM PDT
by
Kansas58
To: two23
Those who object to the HobbyLobby ruling can just find a job someplace else or simply PAY FOR THEIR OWN contraception and abortions.
47
posted on
06/30/2014 7:48:00 AM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: reg45
LOL! You know that’s not going to happen.
To: GregNH; headstamp 2; george76; BuckeyeTexan
RE: I hope the 5 have good security.....
Better pray the 5 have good health until we can replace this abomination in 2016 with someone really conservative.
To: nuconvert
Wrong reading. This decision does not apply to broadly held corporations. However, it refers SPECIFICALLY for the “remedy” or “exception” clause that applies to charitable employers as the exception that should apply to Hobby Lobby.
50
posted on
06/30/2014 7:50:49 AM PDT
by
Kansas58
To: WashingtonSource
As thrilled as I am over this decision, Obamacare should never been ruled constitutional in the first place. This doesn’t square Justice Roberts in my book. He betrayed the American people.
51
posted on
06/30/2014 7:51:29 AM PDT
by
Catsrus
(A)
To: reaganaut1
Well, it was Bush who gave us Roberts as Chief Justice. Roberts is no prize.
To: crosslink
It's a good day in the USA today!!!! The owners of Hobby Lobby...a winning day!!!
53
posted on
06/30/2014 7:53:44 AM PDT
by
caww
To: george76
Great news. The Obama Imperial Presidency is experiencing a lot of problems with this court lately.
54
posted on
06/30/2014 7:58:18 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: george76
A great victory for freedom leading up to Independence Day.
But you can be sure that within a year, given the pattern established under the Obama regime, Hobby Lobby will be indicted for tax fraud or something.
55
posted on
06/30/2014 7:59:53 AM PDT
by
JediJones
(The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
To: Enlightened1
What if NARAL, NOW, or some other organizations sold abortion and contraception insurance, like AARP sells Medicare supplements? That would take the entire question out of the hands of the government and employers. Any woman (or perhaps even man) who wanted coverage could just purchase an abortion / contraception supplement to their health care plan.
56
posted on
06/30/2014 8:02:53 AM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: two23
Those who object to the HobbyLobby ruling can just find a job someplace else.Why would any die-hard, G-d-less liberal want to work at a business that does not support their death cult anyway? What about my right to take a job at Planned Parenthood and then insist they stop funding abortions because it violates my beliefs as an employee?
Why doesn't the liberal illogic that says employees can dictate what moral code a business is allowed to follow apply when it's a conservative employee working for a liberal business?
57
posted on
06/30/2014 8:03:43 AM PDT
by
JediJones
(The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
To: reg45
What if NARAL, NOW, or some other organizations sold abortion and contraception insurance, like AARP sells Medicare supplements? Because it'd be a bad business model. You can be sure that if you offered abortion insurance to liberals that they'd make heavy use of it.
58
posted on
06/30/2014 8:06:10 AM PDT
by
JediJones
(The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
To: george76
A win for our side.
Honestly, I did not see this coming... Happily surprised.
59
posted on
06/30/2014 8:06:30 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(Tri nornar eg bir. Binde til rota...)
To: SeekAndFind
I do think it’s interesting that Ginzburg has not retired. I have to think she does not want Obama to appoint her successor. I’m thinking she doesn’t like the new women on the bench or that she doesn’t like at least one of them.
60
posted on
06/30/2014 8:07:41 AM PDT
by
Mercat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson