“The fight has just began. All we need is another Ginsburg sitting on the court REPLACING someone like Scalia, Alito or Thomas and we’ll be screwed.
This should give some second thoughts to those who insist that a president has to be “pure” during the elections.”
You are so right.
I held my nose and voted for Romney only for and because I believe that he would at least appoint Conservative justices, but we will never know if he would have.
Why would you believe that? Romney de facto instituted homosexual marriage in MA; he also has a history of appointing liberal judges who engage in judicial activism.
This should give some second thoughts to those who insist that a president has to be “pure” during the elections.”
Nobody I know who refused to vote Romney did it because of purity — they did so because he was unacceptable, and would have voted for several good candidates.
IOW, just because there are candidates that are unacceptable does not mean that the only acceptable candidates are perfect.