[SeekAndFind]

[George from New England]

Time to head to Mississippi.

Directions for all RINOs, MS is south of Florida.

[yldstrk]

Religions liberty is foundational to the US, obama, kapish?

[SeekAndFind]

READ THE BLOG ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT’s DECISION HERE:

http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_30_2014#sthash.OfzafGnO.dpuf

[don-o]

[NCC-1701]

FAN FREAKING TASTIC!!!!!

[apillar]

I wonder if this case could set a precedent for the Christian wedding cake makers and photographers being persecuted by the state for refusing to participate in gay marriage? If nothing else it should bolster their argument that you don’t lose your right to practice your religion just because you go into business...

[Grampa Dave]

Good news.

However, the criminals in charge of America, Herr Obozo, Herr Holder and whatever Jarrett is, will ignore this decision llke they ignore the laws of the nation, elections and court decisions which go against their agendas and big donors.

[AnAmericanInEngland]

Make every corporate entity a small closely held company? Other than that, the decision is narrow enough to only affect those types of companies, until the feds fund contraception coverage through regulation.

[EBH]

Now individuals need to demand their religious freedom to not pay for other people’s contraception...

[FreedomGuru]

A teeny tiny success, enjoy but keep on waving your pro life, heterosexual, liberty flag high.

Forward to life and freedom.

[Servant of the Cross]

SCOTUS: "HHS's contraception mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion."

[Girlene]

Awesome news.

[Maurice Tift]

  We owe a lot to Hobby Lobby.

[Campion]

Thanks be to God !!

[bigbob]

so, who really thinks this will put a dent in Obama’s “borrowing of authority” and “acting on his own”?

[jazusamo]

Great news. Libs took two hits today, this and Harris v Quinn.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

“The first reactions from other news sources overread Hobby Lobby significantly. The Court makes clear that the government can provide coverage to the female employees. And it strongly suggests it would reject broad religious claims to, for example, discriminate against gay employees.
by tgoldstein 7:32 AM
Comment
- See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_30_2014#sthash.N2zhDl12.dpuf

[Travis T. OJustice]

WOOT!

[BuckeyeTexan]

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.