I disagree. More and more voters, as well as the general public, want bigger government and more "free stuff." Couple that with rapidly changing demographics fueled by massive immigration, legal and illegal, over the last 25 years and you have the formula for a permanent Democrat majority.
- In the fourth quarter of 2011, 49.2 percent of Americans received benefits from one or more government programs, according to data released Tuesday by the Census Bureau.
In total, the Census Bureau estimated, 151,014,000 Americans out of a population then estimated to be 306,804,000 received benefits from one or more government programs during the last three months of 2011. Those 151,014,000 beneficiaries equaled 49.2 percent of the population.
Also among the 151,014,000 who received benefits from one or more government programs during that period: 49,901,000 who collected Social Security; 49,073,000 who got food stamps; 46,440,000 on Medicare; 23,228,000 in the Women, Infants and Children program, 20,223,000 getting Supplemental Security Income;13,433,000 who lived in public or subsidized rental housing; 5,098,000 who got unemployment; 3,178,000 who got veterans' benefits; and 364,000 who got railroad retirement benefits.
Every cohort that turns 18 annually is more minority and more Democrat. By 2019 half the children 18 and under will be minorities and by 2043 we will be a majority-minority country. In 1970 one in 21 was foreign-born; today, it is one in 8, the highest in 90 years; and within a decade it will be one in 7 the highest in our history. There are electoral consequences associated with these demographic changes. The message of limited government, fiscal prudence, and lower taxes doesn't resonate with the emerging new majority.
There is only one GOP politician out there that gets it when it comes to changing the way the GOP approaches a changing electorate--Jeff Sessions.
Becoming the Party of Work--How the GOP can help struggling Americans, and itself.
"When Americans went to the polls in 2012, the following was true: Work-force participation had sunk to its lowest level in 35 years, wages had fallen below 1999 levels, and 47 million Americans were on food stamps. Yet Mitt Romney, the challenger to the incumbent president, lost lower- and middle-income voters by an astonishing margin. Among voters earning $30,000 to $50,000, he trailed by 15 points, and among voters earning under $30,000 he trailed by 28 points.
And what did the GOPs brilliant consultant class conclude from this resounding defeat? They declared that the GOP must embrace amnesty. The Republican National Committee dutifully issued a report calling for a comprehensive immigration reform that would inevitably increase the flow of low-skilled immigration, reducing the wages and living standards of the very voters whose trust the GOP had lost.
Over the past four decades, as factories were shuttered and blue-collar jobs were outsourced or automated, net immigration quadrupled. Yet the corporate-consultant class has pronounced that an insufficient level of immigration is the problem. A more colossal misreading of the political moment has rarely occurred.
Perhaps the most important political development now unfolding in the U.S. is the publics growing loss of faith in our political and financial elites of both parties. To open the ears of disaffected voters, the GOP must break publicly from the elite immigration consensus of Wall Street and Davos. Republicans have a clear path to building a conservative majority if they free themselves from the corporate consultants and demonstrate to the American public that the GOP is the only party aligned with the core interests, concerns, and beliefs of everyday hardworking citizens.
YOu have an excellent well documentd point. So far the losers are not voting with any huge force. Let’s hope that trend does not change.IMHO, we have been beating ourselves since 2008.
Notice especially in the south, especially, primary challengers don’t quote Randmesty much.
They quote Jeff’s stance on immigration.
They might name drop him with Cruz and Lee as Tea Party candidates; but they dont use any of his issues.