Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Further from the article:

Also included is a ban on ads for "any part or component that's necessary to the function of a gun or intended for attachment to a gun." This covers "gun scopes, ammunition, ammunition clips or belts."

The ban will also halt ads for "dangerous knives... throwing stars, brass knuckles, [and] crossbows," among other things.

Google Support says the ads that will be banned "are subject to change."

1 posted on 06/28/2014 10:29:27 PM PDT by dbehsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: dbehsman
I think I'm getting sick and tired of Google. Maybe I'll drop them a line and let them know I'm calling it Quitsville with them.
2 posted on 06/28/2014 10:31:46 PM PDT by dbehsman (Attention liberals and liberaltarians, Judgment Day is coming. You've earned it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

public company blocking services of those it disapproves of

can we do the same?

what if i owned a Christian cake shop and 2 homos wanted a wedding cake? would i be forced to make it?

of course i would. what was i thinking.

they should form a class action and sue google


3 posted on 06/28/2014 10:32:15 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

“Dangerous Products or Services”

Guess that includes lying media...ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, LAT, etc...

I think they still fall into the category of “services”?


5 posted on 06/28/2014 10:39:42 PM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman
Duck Duck Go
6 posted on 06/28/2014 10:40:08 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

wil they stop ads for virtually all drugs, planned parenthood, auto ads, pools, bathtubs, lithium ion batteries, regular’batteries, etc etc? soda? fast food chains? sugar items? transfat items? violent music?

f@cking hypocrites.


8 posted on 06/28/2014 10:44:26 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman
According to Google Support's "Dangerous Products or Services" page, the company "[wants] to keep people safe both online and offline, so [they] won't allow the promotion of some products or services that cause damage, harm, or injury."

They best block all truck, car and suv ads also...............Just saying...........Statistics wise.............Just saying :)

11 posted on 06/28/2014 10:48:10 PM PDT by The Cajun (Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

IMHO, Google is on a slippery slope. Good luck to them /s. In the mean time I’ll continue using search engines other than Google:

Start Page

Duck Duck Go

Dog Pile

Ixquick

Etc.


12 posted on 06/28/2014 10:49:35 PM PDT by upchuck (Everyday, Joe Wilson becomes more correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

every company that finds its business website blocked should join in Class Action lawsuits against Google .
Google is very wealthy , there are countless billions of $ to be squeezed from them over this one . Bring it on ...ca-ching!


13 posted on 06/28/2014 10:57:34 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

Google should have been sued in to oblivion early on unless they PAID every web site they indexed $$$ for their property. They built their company on other peoples sweat.


15 posted on 06/28/2014 10:58:30 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (NO MORE IRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

Bad enough they spy on us, now they what actively our thwart arms?

Its time to black.


17 posted on 06/28/2014 11:05:52 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

Isn’t pimping homosexuality the same thing as “supporting dangerous services”. You know, that AIDS thing.


24 posted on 06/28/2014 11:24:02 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman
Question, “what does Google gain by this fascist action”? I cannot think of any benefit.
25 posted on 06/28/2014 11:27:25 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

Maybe Google should ban ads on homosexuals. Homosexuals support aids, they run cover for dangerous homosexuals (they never shame the dangerous ones), and they promote these activities for children.


28 posted on 06/28/2014 11:39:18 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

I guess anything that promotes homosexual sex right?


31 posted on 06/28/2014 11:50:42 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

Use ixquick.com


33 posted on 06/29/2014 12:21:07 AM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

Red diaper grandbabies

Detestable


38 posted on 06/29/2014 12:48:18 AM PDT by wardaddy (we will not take back our way of life through peaceful means.....i have 5 kids....i fear for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

What about cigarette ads ?


41 posted on 06/29/2014 12:54:24 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Good for them!!!

Why do people, that know what it (guns and the Second Amendment) is all about, need to be reminded with annoying pop ups and other retail, money making advertisements???

I do not fault people from wanting to make money, but this transcends above and beyond the issue a lot of people are falling on this private companies decision...

Let them live or die by it...

Do we need to be able to have unsolicited internet “pro-gun” information pop up on us here???

I think our ability, as gun owners,(i.e.: activists, hunters) or just plain exercisers of this Right to Keep and Bear Arms, as WE see fit, to communicate just fine by conventional means, word of mouth, print, trade shows, etc etc etc...

We already pass down, if it is needed, all the legacy we need...If it (community) grows, good for us...

If it goes un-passed down from generation to generation, who is really to blame for that???

People could pass gas, and I could make a million dollars on Google selling air freshener...

Ok, can I make the million dollars on some other form of means of communication??? Sure, anyone can...History proves that everyday...

The important thing is to not allow the legacy to go unprepared or not communicated to future generations within YOUR sphere of influence...

Just my opinion...


48 posted on 06/29/2014 2:20:39 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Will work for a new Kidney...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman
I can't resist a really spammy, sarcastic reply.

This is great news for me, as it means that people who might have found their products via Google ads are that much more likely to find them instead at Reloading Bargains, Scopes and Sights, Holster Country, Blades Online, Nock It Archery Gear, or some of our other sites.

People will be much safer once I have their money instead of Google. I approve of this policy!
52 posted on 06/29/2014 3:21:11 AM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbehsman

Google, Apple, and Microsoft are virtually indistinguishable at this point. You’d be a fool to use any of their services or think that any of them is different from the others.

Google is one of the most invasive companies in the world, contributes to leftist causes, and practices censorship to please the left.

Apple is run by a deviant, Tim Cook, and is even more leftist than Google in its political outlook.

Microsoft has been accused of sharing security vulnerabilities with the government so that groups like the NSA can engineer attacks on targets. I wouldn’t be surprised, considering how Snowden’s documents revealed that Microsoft participates in PRISM.

I can’t believe some of my fellow FReepers would recommend Bing. Seriously? You’d trust a convicted monopolist that works hand-in-hand with the government?

You could use StartPage, which pulls search results anonymously from Google. Its parent company is based in the Netherlands, according to its company information, so it should be out of US jurisdiction.

DuckDuckGo is an American startup based right here in the great state of Pennsylvania. isn’t perfect, but it’s trying to do the right thing. It doesn’t track users, and some of its code is even open source.


56 posted on 06/29/2014 5:26:42 AM PDT by Cato in PA (Resist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson