Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: uncitizen
I'm wondering about those three. The "Tea Party" has a huge problem with people wearing that label yet being opposed to almost everything constitutional conservatives stand for. Who were they taking those pictures for, anyway? If they were on their own, those three were totally clueless about what constitutional conservatives want. If they were working for Cochran, that's equally despicable.

Bottom line: they stopped representing the "tea party" when they took those pictures.

11 posted on 06/27/2014 9:59:54 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: grania

He probably was a Cochran man posing as A Tea Partier whose usefulness to Cochran was over. He learned several lessons the hard way, not the least is that dead men tell no tales.


20 posted on 06/27/2014 10:33:33 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: grania

You have a point. This doesn’t sound like tea party ethics at all.


21 posted on 06/27/2014 10:46:05 AM PDT by Loud Mime (arguetheconstitution.com See if the video makes sense to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: grania

Yes, I don’t know about those three as I hadn’t really followed that story. But generally what you’re saying about TEA imposters is no doubt true.

Still this is a message to real TEA Party members and leaders and those thinking about getting involved.

Choosing this guy as the target might’ve just been a decision because it would be a bit harder to make him into a victim than say one of the lovely TEA Party leaders we see on the news.


28 posted on 06/27/2014 12:06:51 PM PDT by uncitizen (Buckle up! We're on the Facism Fast Track!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson