Posted on 06/26/2014 5:26:21 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Last week, a Wisconsin special prosecutor set the political world on fire when he alleged, and a variety of venues credulously repeated, that Gov. Scott Walker was at the center of a “criminal scheme” involving the illegal coordination of conservative groups and fundraisers when he faced a recall election in 2011-2012.
“The governor and his close confidants helped raise money and control spending through 12 conservative groups during the recall election campaigns, according to the prosecutors’ filings,” the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported on June 19.
Special prosecutor Francis Schmitz wrote that Walker was involved in “criminal violations of multiple elections laws, including violations of Filing a False Campaign Report or Statement and Conspiracy to File a False Campaign Report or Statement.”
Ed Morrissey wrote a compelling post outlining why these charges were flimsy, and it was irresponsible of a number of media outlets – including The Washington Post and The New York Times – to repeat them so uncritically.
“They’re deliberately misleading people by minimizing or outright omitting the fact that two different courts have looked at these charges and sneered at them,” Morrissey wrote.
Under pressure, Schmitz stood by the incendiary charge against Walker. On Thursday, however, he seemed to be changing his tune:
“Gov. Scott Walker has not been a target of the John Doe investigation into alleged illegal campaign finance coordination, an attorney for the special prosecutor overseeing the probe said Thursday,” The Wisconsin State Journal reported.
Randall Crocker, the lawyer for special prosecutor Francis Schmitz, noted the investigation has been halted, saying, “At the time the investigation was halted, Governor Walker was not a target of the investigation. At no time has he been served with a subpoena.”
Crocker clarified that Schmitz had included Walker’s name in a probe into documents relating to what he referred to again as a “criminal scheme.”
“While these documents outlined the prosecutor’s legal theory, they did not establish the existence of a crime; rather, they were arguments in support of further investigation to determine if criminal charges against any person or entity are warranted,” Crocker concluded. “Mr. Schmitz has made no conclusions as to whether there is sufficient evidence to charge anyone with a crime.”
The investigation into the John Doe scandal was halted last month by a federal judge. Prosecutors have appealed that ruling.A spokeswoman for the Wisconsin Democratic Party told the State Journal that they “agree with prosecutors that further investigation is warranted.”
The dumba$$, ‘rat prosecutors need to be in the docket.
This is what is called covering your arse.
how do they get away with this?
Page 64 in tomorrow’s Madison paper.
It was in the news here in Minneapolis for five days. I’m sure tomorrow there will be a big story about how Walker was never a target. Yeah, that’s it.
The witch hunt wasn’t about putting anyone in prison, it was about the headline; to make low info voters THINK there was some corruption. The same thing with the first witch hunt which oddly ended with no serious charges just before the recall vote.
Whole thing a fraud from the get-go. Everything cooked up by Dems furious about Walker derailing the Dem-union gravy train. The ambulance chasers who cooked this up ought to be disbarred. Dems are absolutely shameless.
Prosecutor forced to admit Scott Walker is not target of John Doe.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
You got that right. Ten years each one.
So very, VERY tired of the Libtards in my state. I have a feeling, come November, that they’re going to get spanked but good!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.