Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12; demshateGod; P-Marlowe; Dr. Sivana; Black Agnes; xzins; Jane Long; sand88
6. In my honest opinion, McDaniel narrowly lost this primary election because he was too honest. Unfortunately that does not work today. He could have been more conciliatory to all factions. It is very difficult to win from only conservative voters. That is just the reality today. That does NOT mean conservatives should compromise principles. But if they want to win, they must learn to sugarcoat the message. Reagan was a master at that. I remember watching his every speech on TV. I became a US citizen in 1970 and have followed politics closely since then.

Other than cochran calling conservatives a bunch of racists and getting the Black vote to come out for him McDaniel wins this going away. McDaniel was a very credible candidate. The problem with "sugar coating" the message is voters don't know what to believe or expect from the candidate.

I can remember voting for candidates that were "soft" thinking that they would be tough once they were in office and every time they let me down. As I watch this country decline my thinking is if the candidate isn't a conservative there is no point in voting.

Reagan was not a soft message guy. He was tough as nails. People often think he was soft because he was smooth, relaxed and jovial. He stuck to his principals when all those around him wavered. We need leaders that are tough conservatives.

216 posted on 06/25/2014 1:53:53 PM PDT by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights
Reagan was not a soft message guy. He was tough as nails. People often think he was soft because he was smooth, relaxed and jovial. He stuck to his principals when all those around him wavered. We need leaders that are tough conservatives.

We are saying the same thing. Reagan stuck with his conservative principles, but he was incredibly skilled at delivering his message without scaring anyone. His famous "shining city on the hill" made every one feel optimistic. McDaniel should have talked less about cutting spending (which scares many people) and talked more about TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY. That TEA party name is incredibly effective yet I hardly hear it being repeated often.

219 posted on 06/25/2014 2:25:27 PM PDT by entropy12 (Obummer = worst president ever, thanks to voters who abstained on election day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson