Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republican Wildcat

“Non-violent” will soon be set aside for “all.”


37 posted on 06/25/2014 5:39:24 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks; Republican Wildcat; fieldmarshaldj; Impy
>> “Non-violent” will soon be set aside for “all.” <<

I agree. If Rand Paul gets this bill passed, some liberal judge will strike down the "non-violent" rule for convicted felons and say its unfair and violates equal protection rules because both the violent and non-violent offender have "done their time and paid their debt to society" and have had their full rights restored, so its "fundamentally unfair" to say one of them can vote and one can't.

Good news for Fabian Nunez after AHNULD pardoned his murderous thug son.

Plus, as I noted earlier, Rand did NOT include an exception to ban felons convicted of VOTE FRAUD from voting. Al Franken is probably jealous he didn't introduce the bill.

41 posted on 06/25/2014 11:01:14 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Looking at the weather lately, I could really use some 'global warming' right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson