Skip to comments.
‘Crackpot Plan’ To Split California Into Six States Shoots For 2016 Ballot
Breitbart ^
| 6-23-14
| by ROBERT WILDE
Posted on 06/23/2014 1:51:31 PM PDT by kingattax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: Puppage
In my best Oprah voice:
“And YOU get a bullet train! And YOU get a bullet Train! and YOU....”
41
posted on
06/23/2014 2:32:07 PM PDT
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: kingattax
Six Cali’s no way. We only need two- East California and West California. The east would be red, the west would be blue.
42
posted on
06/23/2014 2:32:21 PM PDT
by
Pajamajan
( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
To: DAC21
I would be quite happy to fire the Sacramento Tyrants.
43
posted on
06/23/2014 2:32:37 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(Californians are losing their right to keep and bear firearms one firearm at a time.)
To: drpix
Soon enough it will all be Mexico/Aztlan!
You know, apart from Texas, Arizona and a couple other states, I'm not sure I'd mind a map that looks like that.
Would LOVE to see CA and NM Liberals forced to live as citizens of Mexico ...
To: DAC21
All of this is academic nonsense.. but for the sake of argument I find it hard to believe that liberals (that run California) would allow a split to occur that gives pubs half or more of the new states. Maybe their gerrymandering work is not complete yet. :-)
To: kingattax
California is a shi! hole of communists Democrats in the most populace areas. The rest of the State have more conservative thinkers. But the split is crazy. Like America, California will be a ghost of a State and damn poor. Any real conservative American will just get the hell out of the State.
To: kingattax
Based on the distribution shown, it sounds like a grand idea. I’d like to see Ohio broken into three states, and Illinois into two. PA should be three. NY should be at least two. VA should be two, also.
The added Congressional headcount would add to the Electoral Vote count, and the new distribution would better represent areas currently under-represented in presidential elections.
This is NOT a bad thing.
47
posted on
06/23/2014 2:39:27 PM PDT
by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
To: Logical me
california has become a de facto suburb of tijuana.
48
posted on
06/23/2014 2:40:40 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
To: Jim Robinson
I say make every county is the US a state and thus create 3144 states, 6288 US Senators and 9432 Congressmen.
They would be paralyzed and could do nothing.
To: kingattax
This could be offset by turning New England into one state. New England is a lost cause so let’s reduce the number of Democrat senators from 11.5 to 2 (Ayotte is a democrat in any conservative state).
50
posted on
06/23/2014 2:41:27 PM PDT
by
PTBAA
To: cripplecreek
We don’t need ten more Diane Feinsteins or Barbara Boxers.
51
posted on
06/23/2014 2:42:40 PM PDT
by
DJ Taylor
(Once again our country is at war,and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
To: PubliusMM
please repeat after me :
ANYTHING a loony lefty proposes is never ever ever a good thing. there is always a hidden hook in the worm and being smarter than a fish i will never ever ever forget that.
thank you.
52
posted on
06/23/2014 2:46:11 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
To: DJ Taylor
lol I couldn’t agree more.
53
posted on
06/23/2014 2:47:07 PM PDT
by
Kackikat
To: PTBAA
i would prefer to trade new england to canada for their western provinces.
54
posted on
06/23/2014 2:50:44 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
To: kingattax
3 states might be okay .. but I’m not for 6 at all.
55
posted on
06/23/2014 3:02:40 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(True the Vote: MY AMERICA, "... I'm terrified it's slipping away.")
To: kingattax
It might help if you identified the major cities in each section.
The sections that get SF and LA will have a possible advantage.
That’s why it should be North, South and Central. More than enough.
56
posted on
06/23/2014 3:04:44 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(True the Vote: MY AMERICA, "... I'm terrified it's slipping away.")
To: ken5050
Would all be Democrat from this way of divvying it up?
57
posted on
06/23/2014 3:07:47 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: DAC21; xzins; Jim Robinson
On second thought the yellow area would break Dead Zone, so it would be about a 6/6 split in Senators.Exactly. I'm all for this. I would have the opportunity to have 2 Republican senators and a fiscally responsible state government.
California has 1/10 of the population of the country and 1/50th of the Senators. Not everyone in California is a liberal. FWIW, California has more conservatives living in it than most of the red states (outside of Texas) combined.
58
posted on
06/23/2014 3:08:53 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
To: kingattax
Remember, children:
“As California goes, so goes the nation!”
I support the reapportionment plan.
Keep the Dem’s in certain areas, outnumbered by the Libertarians!
To: kingattax
What happens if the farmers in the central valley cut off LA’s water?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson