No. See my last post. If these claims are true, Hillary should have been disbarred for fabricating “evidence” and for collaborating with an “expert” to produce false testimony. This ISN’T just doing her best to defend someone appointed to her. She broke the law in what she did.
I’ll add this. Though Hillary broke the law in what she did, the prosecution, judge, and jury were all either imbeciles or corrupt to let her get away with it. For instance, when Hillary claimed that this girl had made previous accusations, the court BETTER have required her to document those accusations - and have Hillary thrown out of the court if they were lies.
If that didn’t happen, then I can’t help but wonder if the prosecutors were in on Hillary’s little career stepping-stone here. “Losing” the key DNA evidence - cutting out a swatch from the underwear and then letting Clinton take the rest.... doesn’t sound professional to me.
A lot of corruption surrounded the Clintons in Arkansas. Bill and Hillary have been dealing in lies and in character destruction their whole lives. And they’ve had a lot of help from a lot of people willing to do ANYTHING to advance themselves or “the cause”.