Yes, but I don’t think they are trained to just make up accusations about a victim that have no basis in truth, or get a “forensic analyst” who agrees to testify to anything you want. When Clinton found that prosecutors had lost a swatch of the fabric of the girl’s underwear which had the defendant’s blood on it, she took the rest of the underwear and took it some “expert” who agreed to say whatever Hillary wanted him to say.
Both of those things should have gotten Hillary disbarred.
This wasn’t just Hillary doing her best to defend somebody appointed to her. This was Hillary breaking the law and ethics in 2 different ways, and so figuratively raping a 12-yr-old virgin girl who had been in a coma because of the viciousness of the attack against her. And then priding herself on her conduct, boasting on tape.
I guess it was good practice for Benghazi...
And the story differs, one article says Hillary was appointed and another says a friend asked her to defend this rapist and that he’d specifically requested a female lawyer.