And who is your preference?
Some are Libertarians and would love to see their party win something, anything. Of course, they never do. They never will.
Libertarian Party 2012 Platform
Adopted in Convention, May 2012, Las Vegas, NV.
[Baby need a new pair of SHOES!! Roll'em!!]
==============================================
HOWEVER, the Libertarians, as always, DO have some amusement value for us. They live in the Twilight Zone....Rod Serling and the dododododododo music here.
And who is your preference?
My preference is the GOP to move right, and that will fail to happen as long as liberals in the GOP keep winning.
If that means voting a TRUE preference, a limited government Christian conservative like Cruz or Palin who stands FOR cutting back government, or if it means voting for a no-name third-party candidate knowing full well the candidate will lose, that is how I will vote. I will vote for my preference and in actual functional terms, of realistic achievements, I am voting to weaken the mandate of whichever collectivist leftist wins, the Republican or the Democrat; there is zero appreciable difference in end results.
My preference is for liberals to be weak.
Your preference is apparently to keep the Republican party turning left, because that is certainly what happens when liberal Republicans win, primary or general.
Nuts to you.
And you will vote for your preference, which you wrongly perceive as being "against" the Democrat.
News for ya, oldbrowser and cloudmountain no matter how much you wish it wasn't so, no matter how much you protest, no matter how much you pretend otherwise ...
... voting "against" is pretend. Voting "against" is in your imagination. There is no place on your or my ballot to vote "against" the Democrat presidential candidate, not a single one.
There is ONLY a place to vote for a different candidate. The only way you can vote "against" is to vote for something else.
Voting "against" loses even when it wins.