If one (Bush) makes a prudent judgment based on the best available evidence, the fact that evidence is thereafter determined to be partially or wholly imperfect, does not render the decision invalid - especially where the decision was peer-supported.
(I also seem to recall the Germans were heavily involved in the manufacturing process, or had some degree of interest.)
RE: the fact that evidence is thereafter determined to be partially or wholly imperfect, does not render the decision invalid - especially where the decision was peer-supported.
How about OPPOSITION supported?
Count them — Joe Biden, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid, John Edwards, Chuck Schumer, Maria Cantwell, Chris Dodd, etc. ALL VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE RESOLUTION TO INVADE IRAQ.