No more Bushes. No more Amnesty Pimps.
1 posted on
06/18/2014 2:18:30 PM PDT by
jimbo123
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: jimbo123
All Bushes for has-beens. We need Conservatives. No more GOPe & RINOs.
2 posted on
06/18/2014 2:20:04 PM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: jimbo123
3 posted on
06/18/2014 2:20:11 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: jimbo123
He should be dead to every single pro lifer. Never forget Terri Schiavo.
4 posted on
06/18/2014 2:21:02 PM PDT by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: jimbo123
NO
6 posted on
06/18/2014 2:21:46 PM PDT by
Ray76
(True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
To: jimbo123
The sooner we stick to ‘NO!” with the exclamation point, the sooner we can get conservatives into power.
7 posted on
06/18/2014 2:21:55 PM PDT by
Norm Lenhart
(How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
To: jimbo123
“’Jeb would be perfectly acceptable to the base if the nominee is a proven conservative,’...”
According to whom?
8 posted on
06/18/2014 2:22:34 PM PDT by
EEGator
To: jimbo123
No G-D Dammit, NO No No....
The only bad thing about Reagan was that he ended up having to pair up with Mr. Thousand Points of Light NWO HW Bush the Weakling Wimp epitome of the Rockefeller Republican Checked Pants moron GOPe jackwad establishment...
9 posted on
06/18/2014 2:23:00 PM PDT by
GraceG
To: jimbo123
10 posted on
06/18/2014 2:23:06 PM PDT by
bgill
To: jimbo123
That’s the worst part of Reagans legacy. He took on a Bush and it wound up undoing everything he did. I swear by all that’s holy, I will not vote for another Bush.
11 posted on
06/18/2014 2:23:08 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: jimbo123
13 posted on
06/18/2014 2:24:44 PM PDT by
meadsjn
To: jimbo123
Why would a strong conservative want a VP who is Democrat in Republican clothing?
To: jimbo123
To: jimbo123
Interesting trial balloon. Note that the week after the weasel’s loss, the crony capitalists are talking another Bush for VP. I guess they’ve gotten the message that they aren’t likely to get the top slot, so they’re triangulating.
16 posted on
06/18/2014 2:27:26 PM PDT by
RKBA Democrat
(Be a part of the American freedom migration: freestateproject.org)
To: jimbo123
Speculation among Republican strategists is that Bush won’t run for president in 2016,(HOORAY!!) but might be willing to be a strong conservative’s running mateSure to sink any conservative candidate's campaign lower than whale guano (and that's pretty low!!)
To: jimbo123
20 posted on
06/18/2014 2:33:00 PM PDT by
capydick
(''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
To: jimbo123
21 posted on
06/18/2014 2:33:06 PM PDT by
Ouchthatonehurt
("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
To: jimbo123
22 posted on
06/18/2014 2:34:44 PM PDT by
expat2
To: jimbo123
To: jimbo123
If you mean to replace Julia Louis-Dreyfus on the HBO show, then sure (though he'd have to get in line after Joe Biden).
If you're talking about something else, I don't think so. The Republican advantage next time is going to be that they aren't the same old same old thing as usual. Nominate a Bush and you lose that.
25 posted on
06/18/2014 2:38:14 PM PDT by
x
To: jimbo123
Jebbie’s wife is 100% Mexican and he has such a soft spot for Mexicans that VP in Mexico is a good spot for him.
Let him convince Mexico they should provide amnesty for all the illegals coming over their southern border.
26 posted on
06/18/2014 2:38:14 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(The Obamas' Black skin has morphed into Teflon thanks to the Obama Media)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
