some ‘unimpeachable’ insider , with abundant evidence , needs to rat this man out . To the max . There is someone out that that knows his secrets , knows the truth . They need to come forward . The man they are protecting does not deserve the protection .
“some ‘unimpeachable’ insider , with abundant evidence , needs to rat this man out “
There’s a reason that everybody around the president is a crook. You don’t hire boy scouts to steal. There is probably not one honest person around him. There’s doubtless nobody honest close enough to give direct evidence. Before Obama took office I had lunch with a former state prosecutor. He went down the list starting with Holder and outlined their crimes. He shook his head and said, “nobody has ever occupied the office and surrounded himself with so many criminals. This is going to be horrible (for the people) on an epic scale.”
They will need physical as well as legal protection because there is little doubt that some lunatic Obama supporter would try to murder them to shut them up.
Well, since they are all RATs...I don't know if there is such a thing.
needs to rat this man out
Ha, that's exactly right.
Look how many insiders it took to “persuade” Nixon to resign. McCord, Gray, Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Kleindienst, Dean, Richardson, Ruckelshaus. Oh, I guess Cox, too, because Nixon appointed him as Special Prosecutor. And, of course, “Deep Throat.”
There were 25 subsequent convictions of various Nixon insiders, who were incarcerated.
The Washington Post, Walter Cronkite, and even the US Supreme Court were implicitly swaying public opinion against the President, simply by an honest treatment of the preponderance of the evidence.
None of those conditions similarly obtain in our time.