Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator
"Later you agreed that you had each and everyone I had listed in my post."

Ahhh I see you are impaired. OK I will type real slow so you can keep up. Wireless and Sat ARE NOT repeat NOT a competing Cable Company NOR are they a Competing DSL Internet Company.

Again...

Wireless and Sat ARE NOT repeat NOT a competing Cable Company NOR are they a Competing DSL Internet Company.

One more time...

Wireless and Sat ARE NOT repeat NOT a competing Cable Company NOR are they a Competing DSL Internet Company.

And just for good measure...

Wireless and Sat ARE NOT repeat NOT a competing Cable Company NOR are they a Competing DSL Internet Company.

Even you should be able to get it now if not have an adult help you with the big words.

137 posted on 06/19/2014 12:36:24 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg

“Ahhh I see you are impaired. OK I will type real slow so you can keep up. Wireless and Sat ARE NOT repeat NOT a competing Cable Company NOR are they a Competing DSL Internet Company.”

They are providers and their existence proves that there is competition.

You can get 10mps download satellite for $59 a month. That is competitive with cable.

Cell phone internet is competitive and also VERY portable. I used to have DSL and had no major issues with it even over phone lines built in the 70’s.


140 posted on 06/19/2014 12:56:01 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson