Is that so? Well, how do you explain her big support of Mitt Romney in 2012?
Here is an article which popped up in a two-minute Google search which describes Laura's position in 2012 quite the contrary to your suggestion:
09/10/2012
Conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham tore into Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on her Monday radio show, arguing that the 2012 presidential race was what she called a "gimme election."
Speaking to the GOP, Ingraham said, "If you can't beat Barack Obama with this record, then shut down the party. Shut it down. Start new, with new people."
Ingraham focused her dissatisfaction towards the political consultants Romney hired to run his campaign.
During the Republican primary, Ingraham argued that Romney would have to bring his "A-game" to the general election in order to beat Obama. "I don't know if Mitt Romney can beat him," Ingraham said on ABC's "This Week," recalling a conversation she had with prominent conservatives. (emphasis supplied)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/10/laura-ingraham-gop-obama-shut-down-party_n_1871911.html
Agreed, Ingraham has her RINO problems, as does Coulter. Even Levin gets tripped up when he’s ‘good friends’ with Rubio or Hatch.
But all three of them are good and outspoken about illegal immigration, which is more than most of the GOPe—or even many purported tea party types—have to offer.