Posted on 06/16/2014 1:31:34 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
With its cover story [1] on Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, The New Republic has hit an all-time low. Written by TNR Senior Editor Alec Macgillis, it reads as a commissioned hit job meant to lessen Walkers chances of entering the GOP presidential race.
Lets start with the cover: superimposed over a photo of the governor standing by his desk is the title: Scott Walker is So Hot Right Now: Too bad he owes his success to a toxic strain of Racial Politics. Inside the issue, the title becomes: The Unelectable Whiteness of Scott Walker: A Journey Through the Poisonous, Racially Divided World that Produced a Republican Star.
What you will not find anywhere is a discussion of what led the electorate to not only vote for Scott Walker, but to elect him despite the combined opposition of the AFL-CIO, the Occupy movement, and the entire left-wing media. After all, why bother with facts when readers are told he is unelectable?
For those desiring to find out about Walkers record and why he would make a strong Republican national candidate, you can find it summed up by Marc Thiessen [2] in the Washington Post, and in a column [3] I wrote last November.
Whatever the future holds for the governor, this story reveals something that was not TNRs or the authors intent. They are worried that Scott Walker has broad appeal and that he would make a formidable opponent. This article is meant to nip any Walker candidacy in the bud, and to assure that he will not even try to enter the race. In carrying out this task, journalist Macgillis has written an article devoid of any real charges of merit against Walker, and in which he brings up much that cannot be tied to Walker in any meaningful way.
What really irks TNR is not anything Macgillis brings up in the article, but Walkers many accomplishments. The most important one, as they well know, was that he successfully took on the teachers’ union and public sector unions, whose tie-ins with Democrats assured them the kind of benefits private sector workers do not have and which worked to break the budget of the state government. By taking away their right to bargain over fringe benefits, Walker took away the incentive for many teachers and public workers to stay in the union, and the ranks of those who belonged began to drop tremendously. Taxes were lowered, the states budget was brought into balance, and other conservative reforms were implemented. As Marc Thiessen wrote, Walker has long found a way to appeal to the center while governing as a conservative. And he actually received in his election as governor the votes of a large number of voters who also voted for Barack Obama.
That kind of success puts a scare into TNRs left-leaning editors.
So what does Macgillis actually write that supposedly damns Walker? A good part of his story is an intelligent portrayal of demographic changes that took place long before Walker was in politics. Simply put, whites left the city of Milwaukee for the suburbs, and African-Americans moved in. The result was a split city. From the ’60s to the ’90s, the black population shot up tremendously, to 30 percent of the population. That figure increased to 40 percent by 2014. This coincided, Macgillis notes, with the collapse of the industrial base and the disappearance of manufacturing jobs they once had, so that today it has the second-highest black poverty rate in the United States.
What does any of this have to do with Scott Walker, who became governor after all this had occurred? Nothing at all.
Moreover, the kind of educational reforms Walker supports are precisely the kinds of things that would help the black underclass receive a better education and gain a chance for their children to work their way out of the poverty of their parents generation.
Macgillis cannot come up with anything racist, at all, that Walker said which might feed white hostility towards African-Americans. Since he cannot, his answer is guilt by association.
He spends a good part of his piece attacking two talk-radio hosts who broadcast in Milwaukee, Mark Belling and Charlie Sykes. Their impact is profound, he claims, and he links as an example the loss of the chances of two moderate Republicans running in a primary election to these broadcasters’ opposition to them. How is Walker tied to them? Walker ran, he says, after the result of their power, when white Milwaukee was receptive to anti-Obama ferver, and Walker won a primary in which another conservative had been originally favored as a result of the radio hosts’ endorsement of Walker.
And why is any of this racist?
Macgillis gives the answer by saying Walkers base is in the suburbs. Since Milwaukee is where the blacks live — and they did not vote for him — this proves that Walker is a racist, and the white mans candidate.
In that case, any whites who vote differently than African-Americans, most of whom are solidly and predictably Democrats, are also racists. What this proves is that when push comes to shove, the Lefts answer to conservative solutions advocated by men like Scott Walker is to condemn the conservative as a racist. Oh yes, he also cites e-mails written by an anonymous person that included a racist joke, which Walkers chief of staff forwarded to someone. He adds that Walker fired two of his staff for making offensive comments. He does not add the obvious: this act alone shows that Walker is not racist, and got rid of staff members who he thought were.
Walkers other offense is that he regularly was in touch with the two talk-radio hosts who were on his side, shared e-mails with Sykes, and has appeared on his and Bellings radio programs. And, horror of horrors, Walkers speaks in a nasal tone, made worse when he spoke at Wisconsins Republican convention because he had a cold, and gave a pedestrian speech which the author acknowledges the crowd loved. Walker, he says, thinks he is ready for the national scene. MacGillis conclusion: he is not, and cannot get the necessary votes beyond the same shrinking pool of voters that Romney drew on.
So a man who managed to stand up to scores of disorderly and extremely vocal and angry protestors, went to work pushing to his office through the hundreds who took up every public space in the states capitol building, and was calm throughout — this man supposedly cannot stand up to the attacks that would be brought against him were he to be nominated, and he cannot get the votes of people who are independent or not aligned with either political party.
Macgillis also mocks Walkers religious beliefs. He chides Walker for at times comparing himself to Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr, noting that they were both sons of Baptist ministers, and that Walker told his college yearbook “I really think theres a reason why God put all these political thoughts in my head.” Secularists may find that off-putting and silly, but for one who is a serious believer, it does not appear that way.
And Martin Luther King Jr. developed his motivation for activism from his own belief in religious precepts, something that does not occur to Macgillis, and if it did, he would never mock it.
Even more egregious than Macgillis article are the captions in the accompanying photos. One shows a young school photo of Walker, captioned: The future Republican darling in high school. Another says he has been ensconced in a bubble of adulation, clearly contradicted by Walkers full knowledge of the fury of his opponents.
Whether or not Scott Walker runs will not be determined by TNRs hit job. It will depend on whether or not Walker wins re-election in Novembers gubernatorial race, and by whether his win, if it occurs, is by a high margin. Then, should he decide to enter the race, he will indeed be a formidable challenger to the other Republican contenders. Should he win over the competition, he would be a strong Republican nominee who could also pose a serious challenge to Hillary Clinton.
I wish he would run for president.
Leftist new Republic editors run hit on Scott Walker (magazine cover credets his success in Wisconsin on “racism”)
FReep mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
Rush slammed this screed today. At first I thought Rush said it was on FREE Republic. Scott Walker looks like a winner to me but I’m not clear on his amnesty position.
RE: Scott Walker looks like a winner to me but Im not clear on his amnesty position.
_________________________
Not sure if you are going to like it.
SEE HERE:
http://www.ontheissues.org/governor/Scott_Walker_Immigration.htm
Thank you. I tweeted this article; they are afraid because he has the strengths and personality to beat Hillary. He comes across strong but not a bully like Christie.
Cruz plays Chess: Is he too snooty for America?
Walker would be my first choice for president.
on my short list for a long time.
Libtard media runs hit piece.
Libtard politicians now reference libtard media hit piece as “evidence” and “unbiased reporting source” for their political attacks.
Libtard media then generates new stories interviewing libtard attacking politicians to give them cover for additional attacks, the cover being an attempt to pass it off as a journalism news story.
And the libtard cycle repeats.
We used to have a temporary visa for migrant workers to come here from south of the border to work on harvests/seasonal/temporary jobs and return home after the job was done. This program worked fine until the Rats & Rinos saw them as a voting bloc to be exploited. Now here we are with millions of illegal aliens AND THEIR FAMILIES living full-time in the USA on the dole.
Let’s go back to President Eisenhower’s program of securing the border and enforcing immigration laws. Maybe we can catch a break by taking Republican control of both Houses and undo the mess by putting Conservatives in the leadership positions. President Walker would go for that program, I expect.
What is his position on the 2nd amendment?
He’s for it as long as he has a clear majority of others for it. He doesn’t like controversy of any kind.
Lefties fear walker because he appeals to moderate Democrats.
He was able to get elected in milw cty and hold that office in a heavily dem strong hold.
That’s why they fear him.
But it’s my hope he doesn’t run. Need him here for a decade or so. We spent to long under the tyranny of dems.
Thanks SeekAndFind.
“What is his position on the 2nd amendment?”
We need guns, lotsa guns!
bkmk
I would vote for him.
Gov. Scott Walker has made liberal, socialist Democrats furious for one big reason, and it’s not racism. Walker told union government employees and union public school teachers the party at taxpayer expense was over, no more automatic raises, no free ride on insurance & pensions. Also, seniority does not cover you for sloth and shoddy work. I know this as I live & pay taxes in Wisconsin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.