Posted on 06/16/2014 6:47:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
It seems to be all one way at the moment.
Obama: making the world safe for Islam.
But they are not just killing each other. Mosul is the historic Nineveh, the city to which Jonah was sent by God. St. Thomas the Apostle went to Nineveh, and that city is the Christian center of Iraq. So it’s not just Sunni/Shia. It’s Islam against the world.
Yep, I have yet to hear any option for us that sounds good.
The Iranians have way more to lose here than we do.
The problem is that these guys being successful emboldens Islamists around the world. And they won’t be just attacking other Muslims, as the news from Kenya this morning shows.
Otherwise you are quite right that these guys are not a real military threat.
yes, they believe it’s riot time.
Obama can’t be trusted to do the right thing even if forced.
I’ll say it over and over. We should never have gone in to Iraq. We should never have stayed. We should never go back.
Works for me. This has all the makings of a potential major shite vs. Sunni sectarian conflict — which is primarily why Obama is so reluctant to get involved. He can’t help one side without becoming the immediate and total enemy of the other side, and that he dare not do.
But, hey. This is one time I can actually support his indecision making. If your two worst enemies are beating each other to a pulp, the smart thing to do is step back and let them duke it out.
One side or the other will win. Whichever side wins, will then take all the resources it has conquered, use the resources to rearm themselves, and then turn on Israel, Europe, and us. We must either convert or destroy all the militants, regardless of whatever corner of Muslim theology they happen to choose to reside.
Unless we are willing to enter and commit mass slaughter by whatever means that far outweighs what’s going on there now, we have nothing to contribute. And then we will face the recriminations of the rest of the world who still insists Islam is a wonderful religion that we need to understand more deeply. Like the Brits.
There’s plenty of damage that can be done with AK-47’s. And as far as ISIS, I’m sure the $490 MM they looted from the banks they overran will buy any number of party-favors from any number of willing sellers.
We are on the upslope of this wave of sectarian violence. Not the peak, not the tail end. Sect after sect has been encouraged and is bound to continue. These societies have no way to defend themselves against this and our military isn’t set up to do so either. It’s a crappy situation but we will have to wipe out whole towns to have any effect.
Let the inbred, pedophile-worshipping misogynists (mozlums) kill each other. Civilization will advance with fewer of them.
You are correct, sir.
> Ill say it over and over. We should never have gone in to Iraq. We should never have stayed. We should never go back.
It’s always about the money the military contractors making welling weapons of war and the donations (kickbacks) to the politicians that are their buddies. Wouldn’t it be a wonderful world if PACs, special interest groups, and lobbyists didn’t exist?
I respectfully don’t agree. We should have nuked the entire middle east into orbit and said, “anybody else want to mess with us?”
Take a look at this lively discussion on this other thread for this same article ... :-) ...
Let Them Kill Each Other
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3168244/posts
“Unless we are willing to enter and commit mass slaughter by whatever means that far outweighs whats going on there now, we have nothing to contribute”
That’s what we should have done from the git-go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.