Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txrefugee

What part of the world should we have bombed after 9/11? All of the terrorists were Saudi, and BinLaden was a Saudi national.


15 posted on 06/14/2014 8:02:36 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: grania

It’s simple really. As I and another fellow discussed on the night of 9/11:

Tell the Moslem world they have 48 hours to produce Osama Bin Laden. If they don’t, nuke Jakarta and Tripoli.

Give them another 48 hours: no Osama - nuke the next two major Moslem population centers closing in from the east and the west.

Repeat until we either have Osama, or we obliterate Mecca and Medina.

I still maintain that it would have ultimately been the kindest and most effective approach for all concerned, and, with a new demand (now that Osama’s dead), a demand to cease all hostilities and disarm, this would again be the kindest and most effective approach.

This worked beautifully the one time it was tried in history: on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Ultimately, despite the initial brutality of the attack, probably many millions of lives - American, and many times more Japanese lives - were spared.

This is what is required to end war. Total, brutal victory that reorients the mindset of a hostile people. Hearts and minds, nation building? - all simply crap, adolescent utopian nonsense. Completely destroy your enemy’s will to fight, or completely destroy your enemy. The rest is martial masturbation.


38 posted on 06/14/2014 9:31:03 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson